Bug#350391: current debs

2007-07-12 Thread Joey Hess
Eddy Petrișor wrote: This is really weird. During DebConf, when I wanted to ask Tolimar to upload the package the binary was statically linked. I did several rebuilds and got the same result. Now I have rebuilt it myself in a pbuilder chroot and there are no problems. Feel free to fetch

Bug#350391: current debs

2007-07-11 Thread Joey Hess
I trieed Eddy's current debs, and they work great. I see there might be some problems with big endian, but surely that's not a reason to delay uploading this terrific game to unstable? Over 90% of debian users are on little-endian arches, according to popcon. -- see shy jo signature.asc

Bug#350391: current debs

2007-07-11 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 11/07/07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I trieed Eddy's current debs, and they work great. I see there might be some problems with big endian, but surely that's not a reason to delay uploading this terrific game to unstable? Over 90% of debian users are on little-endian arches, according

Bug#350391: current debs

2007-07-11 Thread Joey Hess
Eddy Petrişor wrote: The main problem is not big endian support, the problem is that for all arches except i386 the binary is statically linked. Even amd64? When I build there, I get a dynamic binary. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#350391: current debs

2007-07-11 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Joey Hess wrote: Eddy Petrişor wrote: The main problem is not big endian support, the problem is that for all arches except i386 the binary is statically linked. Even amd64? When I build there, I get a dynamic binary. This is really weird. During DebConf, when I wanted to ask Tolimar to