On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:11:34PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Maybe commenting on what features you feel "make a difference" on this
> package vs. others will help users decide which one to install.
Right you are, I will rewrite the long description and emphasize how
lanmap is
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 04:11:40PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
>
> Should the similarities between PADS and lanmap prevent the latter
> from being packaged for Debian ? I understand they both rely on
Of course not!
> passive network monitoring to produce info, but I still don't see that
> a
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:04:32AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:22:57PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> > * Package name: lanmap
> > Version : 0.1
> > Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://pars
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:22:57PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> * Package name: lanmap
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://parseerror.com/lanmap/
> * License : GPL
> Description : lanmap sits quietly on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lanmap
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://parseerror.com/lanmap/
* License : GPL
Description : lanmap sits quietly on
5 matches
Mail list logo
