Package: wnpp
Owner: Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: twill
Version : 0.8.5
Upstream Author : C. Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://twill.idyll.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Hello,
The package is almost ready. Unfortunately, there is still a remaining
problem: some modules like mechanize (debian package python-mechanize)
and ClientForm (debian packages python-clientform) are in the upstream
source under a minor modified form, I wonder if the upstream author may
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:59:17PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
-> Hello,
->
-> The package is almost ready. Unfortunately, there is still a remaining
-> problem: some modules like mechanize (debian package python-mechanize)
-> and ClientForm (debian packages python-clientform) are in the u
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:37:31PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
-> > "Titus" == Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
->
-> Hello,
->
-> Firstly, thanks for being so responsive ;).
What can I say, you caught me at a good time ;)
-> Titus> twillnow workswith the latest
> "Titus" == Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello,
Firstly, thanks for being so responsive ;).
Titus> twillnow workswith the latestversion of
Titus> ClientForm/mechanize "out of box", I believe, so it should be
Titus> possible to simply remove th
> "Titus" == Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
-> Actually, I have just tried that, however the current version of
-> beautifulsoup in Debian is 3.x whereas mechanize only support
-> beautifulsoup 2.x ATM. So, I wonder how I could fix this issue,
-> any idea?
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:59:02PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
-> > "Titus" == Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
->
-> -> Actually, I have just tried that, however the current version of
-> -> beautifulsoup in Debian is 3.x whereas mechanize only support
-> -> beautifu
Heya,
>
> Actually, I have just tried that, however the current version of
> beautifulsoup in Debian is 3.x whereas mechanize only support
> beautifulsoup 2.x ATM. So, I wonder how I could fix this issue, any
> idea?
>
aaargh! there're way to many weird dependencies in py
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:09:21AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
-> Heya,
-> >
-> > Actually, I have just tried that, however the current version of
-> > beautifulsoup in Debian is 3.x whereas mechanize only support
-> > beautifulsoup 2.x ATM. So, I wonder how I could fix this
Heya,
> (There's no reason why zope3 itself and mechanize would be
> "incompatible".)
>
no, it was just a DD not having realized that Etch was released :P
everything is fine, and the new mechanize will be uploaded soon I guess :)
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Titus" == Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Titus> Ahh, you must be working with an older version. The latest
Titus>version ofmechanize includesBeautifulSoup as
Titus> _beautifulsoup. (That's an accomodation that I can make in
Titus> twill as we
> "Bernd" == Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernd> everything is fine, and the new mechanize will be uploaded
Bernd> soon I guess :)
Hey,
I think that we have to wait for this release and then use the
_beautifulsoup for twill, there isn't another solution
Heya,
> I think that we have to wait for this release and then use the
> _beautifulsoup for twill, there isn't another solution BTW. I will
> prepare the debian package twill tomorrow and upload it as soon as
> mechanize has been uploaded.
>
in the meantime you can get the
13 matches
Mail list logo
