Bug#398093: Sent debian package 9.1-1 to sponsor for review

2009-05-17 Thread Benjamin Mesing
I am awaiting the review/upload of my sponsor. Meanwhile if you are interested, you can fetch the source from http://www.mesing.de/debian/umlet_9.1-1.dsc or the binary from http://www.mesing.de/debian/umlet_9.1-1_all.deb Best regards Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lis

Bug#398093: Sent debian package 9.1-1 to sponsor for review

2009-05-22 Thread Olivier Berger
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:42:48PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > I am awaiting the review/upload of my sponsor. > > Meanwhile if you are interested, you can fetch the source from > http://www.mesing.de/debian/umlet_9.1-1.dsc or the binary from > http://www.mesing.de/debian/umlet_9.1-1_all.deb >

Bug#398093: Sent debian package 9.1-1 to sponsor for review

2009-06-19 Thread Benjamin Mesing
> Thks for the info. > > Any reason why you explicitely depend on openjdk-6-jdk instead of > java6-runtime virtual package ? Even though java6-runtime seems to be in use, there is no such thing within any official documentation (e.g. the java policy) and it is not even an official virtual packag