Bug#403619: LanguageTool status?

2011-01-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:57:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1] (yes, not caring Deoesn't anymore since rc2, fwiw > > about those issues and/or the binary-only jars - I removed it from the > > Debian source) and us not shipping it would b

Bug#403619: LanguageTool status?

2011-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:57:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information > > was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only > > in t

Bug#403619: LanguageTool status?

2011-01-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:57:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > So the version currently in experimental doesn't contain > LanguageTool? Yes. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.

Bug#403619: LanguageTool status?

2011-01-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information > was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only > in the tree but with much work. > > I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1

Bug#403619: LanguageTool status?

2010-12-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only in the tree but with much work. I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1] (yes, not caring about those issues and/or the binary-only jars - I removed