Hi,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:57:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1] (yes, not caring
Deoesn't anymore since rc2, fwiw
> > about those issues and/or the binary-only jars - I removed it from the
> > Debian source) and us not shipping it would b
Hi again,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:57:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information
> > was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only
> > in t
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:57:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> So the version currently in experimental doesn't contain
> LanguageTool?
Yes.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information
> was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only
> in the tree but with much work.
>
> I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1
Hi,
is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information
was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only
in the tree but with much work.
I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1] (yes, not caring
about those issues and/or the binary-only jars - I removed
5 matches
Mail list logo