On mer, 2009-02-18 at 16:27 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On 18-Feb-09, at 15:43, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> > Hey, what's the status of this ITP? I see there may be legal problems
> > with AGPL and technical problems with included external library
> > sources.
> > Is there some news?
> >
> F
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 08:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> SyncEvolution just announced they switched to the newly re-released
> libsynthesis, which is LGPLv2/v3.
>
> See:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/333059/
> http://www.synthesis.ch/indefero/index.php/p/libsynthesis/
> http://www.estamos.de/b
Patrick Ohly wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 08:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>0.9 beta 1 doesn't require anything from Funambol. Everything is
>dual-licensed LGPLv2.1/3.0.
>Regarding packaging: I still consider 0.8.1 the current stable version.
>0.9 beta 1 works, but we still have to redo lo
Hey, what's the status of this ITP? I see there may be legal problems
with AGPL and technical problems with included external library sources.
Is there some news?
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Following up to myself, my plan (which has been delayed
by other commitments) is to package the funambol client
library seperately, but using a version suitable for
syncevolution. You can follow that at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505878
Or you could, if I did anything
On 18-Feb-09, at 15:43, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Hey, what's the status of this ITP? I see there may be legal problems
with AGPL and technical problems with included external library
sources.
Is there some news?
Ftpmasters seem to have blessed agpl, so legal issues are OKish.
Technically
6 matches
Mail list logo
