...are available here:
http://alzental-castle.de/~rd/SL/
Regards,
Rainer
--
Rainer Dorsch
Lärchenstr. 6
D-72135 Dettenhausen
07157-734133
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E
Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/
Hi there,
I'm downloading the 1.17 etch packages and will give them a try.
If the texture issues still arise, I'll upload a screenshot. Anyway,
when I tested it, I also used cafuego's packages (for Ubuntu) just
to see if it was a problem there too, but it wasn't...
OK, testing now the new pac
Hi Marcos,
Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 18:14 schrieb Marcos Torres Marado:
> Also, I would like for you to CC me on issues regarding this bug,
> 'cause like Rainer I'm not getting the replies...
I tried again a few days ago and the subscription works now for me.
Your screenshot looks weired, here
On Sunday 17 June 2007 21:46, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Your screenshot looks weired, here slviewer works definitely better. Not
> sure what is the best way to debug the problem. But do you know which video
> adapter you have and which driver you use?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# lspci|grep 915
00:00.0 Host
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:47:07PM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> On Sunday 17 June 2007 21:46, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>> Your screenshot looks weired, here slviewer works definitely better. Not
>> sure what is the best way to debug the problem. But do you know which video
>> adapter you have and whic
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 15:00 schrieben Sie:
> Are the Etch packages built from the -1 or -2 version of 1.17? The main
> change was using the default g++ instead of the g++-3.4 specified by
> upstream.
-1
> As I understand it, the cafuego packages appear to just be the upstream
> binary releas
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 16:55, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 15:00 schrieben Sie:
> > Are the Etch packages built from the -1 or -2 version of 1.17? The main
> > change was using the default g++ instead of the g++-3.4 specified by
> > upstream.
>
> -1
Can you please package -2
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 18:11 schrieb Marcos Marado:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2007 16:55, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 15:00 schrieben Sie:
> > > Are the Etch packages built from the -1 or -2 version of 1.17? The main
> > > change was using the default g++ instead of the g++-3
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 18:00, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 18:11 schrieb Marcos Marado:
> > On Tuesday 19 June 2007 16:55, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 15:00 schrieben Sie:
> > > > Are the Etch packages built from the -1 or -2 version of 1.17? The
> >
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 19:19 schrieb Marcos Marado:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2007 18:00, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 18:11 schrieb Marcos Marado:
> > > On Tuesday 19 June 2007 16:55, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 15:00 schrieben Sie:
> > > > > Are t
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 19:59, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Here are my data, they are pretty much the same. The only small difference
> I notices is, you have
>
> > ii slviewer-artwork 1.17.0.12-1skin textures and misc data
> > for th
> > ii slviewer-data 1.17.0.12-2Datafi
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:19:15PM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2007 18:00, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 18:11 schrieb Marcos Marado:
> >> On Tuesday 19 June 2007 16:55, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > >> Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 15:00 schrieben Sie:
> > > >> Ar
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 12:50, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> I've not seen the texture problem you're describing with either build
> though, so I'm at a bit of a loss.
Damn, so we have no clue on what's happening here? Do you remember anything
else I can test?
--
Marcos Marado
Sonaecom IT
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
