Your message dated Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:14:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the dnsdoctor package. Because I leave Debian.
The package is complicated and strongly depends on Ruby.
It seems unmaintained upstream. May be a merge with zonecheck (same
code base) should be considered.
The package description is:
DNSdoctor is intended to help solving misconfigurations or
inconsistencies. It will help you by looking for potential errors and
give you a description of the problem and refere you to RFC or other
documents; but of course it is still recommanded that you have some
basic knowledge of how the DNS works.
The DNSdoctor configuration file reflect the policy to use. You can
let it select the best test set to apply when checking a zone (use of
a reverse delegation profile for .ip6.arpa or .in-addr.arpa, and a
generic profile for other TLDs); but on the other hand, you can also
force the use of a particular profile or create a new one (for example
to test RFC compliance). This package is the command-line version.
http://www.dnsdoctor.org/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
See #419409.
--
Thomas Huriaux
--- End Message ---