Bug#436492: Open64 packaging: any progress?

2009-07-27 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:34:35 +0200 Gürkan Sengün wrote: > Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:37:59 +1000 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:18PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > [...] > >>> How's the packaging going on? > >> It was uploaded but was

Bug#436492: Open64 packaging: any progress?

2009-07-27 Thread Gürkan Sengün
Francesco Poli wrote: On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:37:59 +1000 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:18PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] How's the packaging going on? It was uploaded but was rejected. I'll try to fix the problem with the way debian/copyright was done. An

Bug#436492: Open64 packaging: any progress?

2009-07-25 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:37:59 +1000 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:18PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > >How's the packaging going on? > > It was uploaded but was rejected. I'll try to fix the problem with the > way debian/copyright was done. And then uploaded

Bug#436492: Open64 packaging: any progress?

2009-07-25 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:18PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: >Hi! > >I've just found out this interesting DFSG-free compiler. >Thanks for attempting to package it for inclusion in Debian! > >I fail to see any recent news in this ITP bug. >How's the packaging going on? It was uploaded but was re

Bug#436492: Open64 packaging: any progress?

2009-07-25 Thread Francesco Poli
Hi! I've just found out this interesting DFSG-free compiler. Thanks for attempting to package it for inclusion in Debian! I fail to see any recent news in this ITP bug. How's the packaging going on? Please let me know. Have a nice day. -- New location for my website! Update your bookmarks! h