On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 00:28 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 7. August 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Okay. Before writing upstream, "dpkg -L python-babel" shows everything
> > in site-packages/sidl[x]. Is there a way I can change my EGG-INFO to
> > SIDL instead of Babel? Or woul
On Donnerstag, 7. August 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Okay. Before writing upstream, "dpkg -L python-babel" shows everything
> in site-packages/sidl[x]. Is there a way I can change my EGG-INFO to
> SIDL instead of Babel? Or would that break everything using it (which
> is nothing now, at leas
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 00:05 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. August 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 15:30 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > We talked about the python-babel name clash recently. Although I
> > > renamed my package to "python-pybabel" we seem to
On Mittwoch, 6. August 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 15:30 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > We talked about the python-babel name clash recently. Although I
> > renamed my package to "python-pybabel" we seem to have a problem here.
> > As long as python-babel is installed, P
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 15:30 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Hi, Adam...
>
> We talked about the python-babel name clash recently. Although I renamed my
> package to "python-pybabel" we seem to have a problem here. As long as
> python-babel is installed, Python fails to use "my" Babel package
> c
Hi, Adam...
On Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 16:54 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > On 2008-07-24 16:42, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > Weird. I wasn't aware of an existing python-babel. And I'm
> > > especially suprised that the FTP masters didn't see
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 16:54 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2008-07-24 16:42, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Weird. I wasn't aware of an existing python-babel. And I'm especially
> > suprised that the FTP masters didn't see the conflict either.
>
> That's weird, indeed. Nor did anybody reply to y
On 2008-07-24 16:42, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Weird. I wasn't aware of an existing python-babel. And I'm especially
> suprised that the FTP masters didn't see the conflict either.
That's weird, indeed. Nor did anybody reply to your ITP and
upload mails. The existing python-babel is build from sour
Hi, Martin...
On Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> if I try to install python-babel, I get
> python-babel - Scientific Interface Definition Language (SIDL) Python
> runtime version 1.2.0.dfsg-5. This seems to be totally unrelated to
> python-babel - tools for internationalizing
On Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2008-07-24 16:42, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Weird. I wasn't aware of an existing python-babel. And I'm especially
> > suprised that the FTP masters didn't see the conflict either.
>
> That's weird, indeed. Nor did anybody reply to your ITP
Hi,
if I try to install python-babel, I get
python-babel - Scientific Interface Definition Language (SIDL) Python runtime
version 1.2.0.dfsg-5. This seems to be totally unrelated to
python-babel - tools for internationalizing Python applications
version 0.9.1-2, which I wanted.
I suggest to renam
11 matches
Mail list logo
