On Fri, February 29, 2008 03:02, William Pitcock wrote:
Why does a package need to clarify what's different about it than others
like it? Debian is about having the possibility of choosing between many
options for the same thing e.g. openssh, dropbear for sshd, 12 different
httpd options, etc.
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:16 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Fri, February 29, 2008 03:02, William Pitcock wrote:
Why does a package need to clarify what's different about it than others
like it? Debian is about having the possibility of choosing between many
options for the same thing
On Fri, February 29, 2008 12:41, William Pitcock wrote:
But if you are worried about the QA and security team, then why not
create an unsupported repo. It could even be a good solution towards
recruiting new DDs.
I have no intent of stopping you to create any third party repositories.
Sure
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, William Pitcock wrote:
But if you are worried about the QA and security team, then why not
create an unsupported repo. It could even be a good solution towards
recruiting new DDs.
Lets call it, say, 'community', 'extras', or 'unsupported'.
Please don't!
Kind regards
I created an updated description. Please see below.
One thing i forgot to mention earlier was the feature of logging the http
requests
directly to a mysql-database.
I'm not quite sure, but I think this feature is not supported by most other
webservers.
Description: small http server
Monkey is
William Pitcock dijo [Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:02:39PM -0600]:
Why does a package need to clarify what's different about it than others
like it? Debian is about having the possibility of choosing between many
options for the same thing e.g. openssh, dropbear for sshd, 12 different
httpd
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 10:33 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
But the user should not have to install 10 small HTTP servers just to
know what's the goddamn difference. That's extremely unhelpful from
us. We should tell the prospective user at a first glance why he wants
one httpd over another.
I
William Pitcock dijo [Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 05:41:25AM -0600]:
But if you are worried about the QA and security team, then why not
create an unsupported repo. It could even be a good solution towards
recruiting new DDs.
Lets call it, say, 'community', 'extras', or 'unsupported'.
The main
William Pitcock dijo [Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 05:41:25AM -0600]:
Clearly these packages are different enough to somebody if they are
going to the effort of packaging them. Perhaps they have a superior
configuration format or some other non-notable feature.
But if you are worried about the QA
Hi,
@Guus:
thanks for your hints. I can easily change that.
@Nico:
there is not much difference betweeen monkey and other webservers. There
are already lots of other webservers in the repositories like mini_httpd,
micro_httpd, dhttpd. Do they differ that much?
Debian is always full of pride
Guus Sliepen dijo [Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 07:55:08PM +0100]:
Monkey is a Web Server written in C based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol. The
objective is to develop a fast, efficient, small and easy to configure
webserver.
Although it is very small and does not need much system resources, it
has a
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 18:47 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Guus Sliepen dijo [Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 07:55:08PM +0100]:
Monkey is a Web Server written in C based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol. The
objective is to develop a fast, efficient, small and easy to configure
webserver.
Although it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/08 20:02, William Pitcock wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 18:47 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
[snip]
Even there, it looks very much like other very small webservers,
such as boa, bozohttpd, cherokee, fnord, lighttpd, micro-httpd,
mini-httpd or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thorsten Schmale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: monkey
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : Eduardo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://monkeyd.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description :
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:51:38PM +0100, Thorsten Schmale wrote:
* Package name: monkey
Description : monkey is a small webserver based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol
Don't include the name of the package in the short description. Also,
HTTP/1.1 protocol is more something for the long
Hi Thorsten,
* Thorsten Schmale [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-27 16:19]:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thorsten Schmale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: monkey
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : Eduardo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
16 matches
Mail list logo
