On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:08:53AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
How about removing this obsolete package instead of just orphaning it? I
say obsolete because it didn't adapt to the fact that UTF-8 is the
preferred character encoding nowadays, and better
Agustin Martin wrote:
IIRC, none of aspell or hunspell can handle pseudo-charsets like 'a or TeX
explicit chars \'a, \'{a}, while ispell can, if the aff file has them
declared, so there is no full replacement for ispell.
[could probably sound harsh, but isn't ment as such] i suggest to
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:39:30PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Agustin Martin wrote:
IIRC, none of aspell or hunspell can handle pseudo-charsets like 'a or TeX
explicit chars \'a, \'{a}, while ispell can, if the aff file has them
declared, so there is no full replacement for ispell.
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
How about removing this obsolete package instead of just orphaning it? I
say obsolete because it didn't adapt to the fact that UTF-8 is the
preferred character encoding nowadays, and better replacements exist
(e.g., aspell -i). See also #469016.
the version of
How about removing this obsolete package instead of just orphaning it? I
say obsolete because it didn't adapt to the fact that UTF-8 is the
preferred character encoding nowadays, and better replacements exist
(e.g., aspell -i). See also #469016.
Yes, I know about the huge list of reverse
5 matches
Mail list logo
