Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
> I have sent a mail to the original developers. I'll let you know once they
> answer.
thank you.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
> 3) is not a problem, don't worry about that.
>
> what i wanted from you was a statement for 2).
I have sent a mail to the original developers. I'll let you know once they
answer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
>> 3) The issue with the libraries. Their names are really too generic and
>>they really aren't packaged as proper shared libraries, so you can't
>>put them into /usr/lib.
>
> I think you can change install.cmake so that
>
> SET(LIBDIR "lib[64]")
>
> becomes
>
>
> 3) The issue with the libraries. Their names are really too generic and
>they really aren't packaged as proper shared libraries, so you can't
>put them into /usr/lib.
I think you can change install.cmake so that
SET(LIBDIR "lib[64]")
becomes
SET(LIBDIR "lib[64]/cuneiform")
CMake
Hi Jussi,
> 2) It would be interesting to know where those .dat files come from and
>whether there exists some kind of source for them. In the package itself
>I could not find any information about that.
do you have any information about this?
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel
Hi.
Lets not further leave this package in limbo. The current situation is
as follows:
1) REJECT for missing copyright holders in debian/copyright. That should
be easily fixable.
2) It would be interesting to know where those .dat files come from and
whether there exists some kind of sourc
6 matches
Mail list logo
