On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 20:34 -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 06:15, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No quite, it provides some fault-tolerance. Anyway, you're missing the
> point that this is targeted at a different audience. For example, I've
> just deployed cosign
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 06:15, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OpenId is decentralized and open. This is targeted to a diffrent
>> public (from what I understand), and the authentication is handled by
>> a single source.
> Single Point of Failure ?
No quite, it provides some fault-to
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 04:01 -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> >> Description : Web single sign-on for intranets
> >
> > What's the difference between this and OpenId ?
> > Why the focus on intranets?
>
> OpenId is decentralized and open. This is targeted to a diffrent
> public (from what I unde
Neil,
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 18:51, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Description : Web single sign-on for intranets
>
> What's the difference between this and OpenId ?
> Why the focus on intranets?
OpenId is decentralized and open. This is targeted to a diffrent
public (from wha
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 18:09 -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Martín Ferrari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: cosign
> Version : 2.1.0rc1
> Upstream Author : The University of Michigan
> * URL : http://weblogin.org/
> *
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Martín Ferrari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cosign
Version : 2.1.0rc1
Upstream Author : The University of Michigan
* URL : http://weblogin.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Web single
6 matches
Mail list logo
