Bug#561051: Comments

2011-03-23 Thread Petri Lehtinen
Looks good to me, but shouldn't the -dev package be just libjansson-dev rather than libjansson4-dev? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#561051: Comments

2011-03-23 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Petri Lehtinen wrote: Looks good to me, but shouldn't the -dev package be just libjansson-dev rather than libjansson4-dev? According to the Debian Library Packaging guide [0] using the libfooX-dev namescheme is preferred, but the other solution is good

Bug#561051: Comments

2011-03-23 Thread Petri Lehtinen
Alessandro Ghedini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Petri Lehtinen wrote: Looks good to me, but shouldn't the -dev package be just libjansson-dev rather than libjansson4-dev? According to the Debian Library Packaging guide [0] using the libfooX-dev namescheme is preferred,