(out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> gnetworktester seems to parse the output of nmap and nmap upstream at
> http://insecure.org/nmap/data/COPYING gives me the impression that
> gnetworktester would thus be "derivative work".
IANAL, but since
Le mercredi 09 mars 2011 à 11:27 +, Noel David Torres Taño a
écrit :
> > Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > In general, I do agree with Miriam that parsing the output of another
> > program does not make a derivative work. But just to give an example
> > of where it does happen, git is largely comprised
Le mardi 08 mars 2011 à 07:30 -0800, Ken Arromdee a écrit :
> >> Parsing the output of a program doesn’t make a derivative work. However,
> >> if this parsing is vital for the operation of the application and makes
> >> it useless without that program, what is the difference with dynamic
> >> link
The distinction between a derivative work and a separate work is not
based on technology but on functionality.
Parsing the output of a program doesn’t make a derivative work. However,
if this parsing is vital for the operation of the application and makes
it useless without that program, what is
Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 12:04 +0100, W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
> (out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
>
> On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> > gnetworktester seems to parse the output of nmap and nmap upstream at
> > http://insecure.org/nmap/data/COPYING gives me the impr
2011/3/8 Mahyuddin Susanto :
>> Parsing the output of a program doesn’t make a derivative work. However,
>> if this parsing is vital for the operation of the application and makes
>> it useless without that program, what is the difference with dynamic
>> linking to a library? To a programmer, there
> Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > In general, I wouldn't consider parsing the output of another
> > program to de a derivative work.
>
> In general, I do agree with Miriam that parsing the output of another
> program does not make a derivative work. But just to give an example
> of where it does happen,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/06/2011 11:51 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 12:04 +0100, W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
>> (out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
>>
>> On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
>>> gnetworktester seems to pars
--nextPart2958378.qgascxSZ95
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sunday 06 March 2011 11:04:35 W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> (out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
>=20
> On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> > gnetworktester seems
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:23:22AM -0800, Walter Landry wrote:
> Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > In general, I wouldn't consider parsing the output of another
> > program to de a derivative work.
>
> In general, I do agree with Miriam that parsing the output of another
> program does not make a derivative
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> In general, I wouldn't consider parsing the output of another
> program to de a derivative work.
In general, I do agree with Miriam that parsing the output of another
program does not make a derivative work. But just to give an example
of where it does happen, git is largely
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 12:04:35 +0100 W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> (out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
(I guess you intended to ask to keep the other recipients in Cc: if so,
you should ask explicitly)
>
> On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> > gnetworktester seems to parse the out
12 matches
Mail list logo
