Hi all,
I maintain the packaging scripts that both the fglrx installer and
Ubuntu use. I can assure you that, as Mario said, having the installer
and the distro packages share the same source ensures better
consistency and makes it safer to install the packages generated by
the installer.
There a
I'd like to throw one more idea out here to help with this RFH. Is
there any consideration in adopting the packaging used by Ubuntu? The
way the ATI executable is configured, it includes a set of packaging
scripts for different distros built-in for users to generate native
packages on the fl
2 matches
Mail list logo