about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
591817: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591817
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package
retitle 591817 RFP: rubinius -- Rubinius is an implementation of the Ruby
programming language.
noowner 591817
tag 591817 - pending
thanks
Hi,
A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging rubinius. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs
I've updated my github repo [1] with rubinius 2.0.0rc1.
It's still not archive ready, but it's something. Antonio - can we
touch base on what needs to be done to get this in a state suitable
for experimental?
James
[1] https://github.com/yob/debian-rubinius
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
For anyone interested in trying Rubinius without resorting to RVM,
I've updated Antonio's packaging from September with a snapshot of the
master branch from upstream.
It's still not archive ready, but it's progress.
The repository is currently on my github account [1] and can be built
with
Hello all,
Today I took some time to hack on a Debian package for Rubinius
(http://rubini.us/). I was able to reach a state in which it is works,
but there is still *a lot* of stuff to do before having an
archive-quality package. For example our existing pure-Ruby packages
will not be available
# changing owner to register the fact that Antonio has a working package
owner 591817 Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
thanks
On 05/09/11 at 22:45 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Hello all,
Today I took some time to hack on a Debian package for Rubinius
(http://rubini.us/). I was able to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# changing owner to register the fact that Antonio has a working package
owner 591817 Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
Bug #591817 [wnpp] ITP: rubinius -- Rubinius is an implementation of the Ruby
programming language.
Owner changed from
On 05/09/11 at 22:45 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Today I took some time to hack on a Debian package for Rubinius
(http://rubini.us/). I was able to reach a state in which it is works,
but there is still *a lot* of stuff to do before having an
archive-quality package. For example our
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
I think it makes sense to work closely with upstream on this package, to
get it in an appropriate shape without carrying too many patches on our
side.
Sure, specially because fluent Japanese won't be a requirement for that. ;-)
Have you contacted them?
On 11-05-08 1:26 PM, antono.vasil...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. I will get my packages updated for this. I was depending on
the custom-compiled llvm2.8 and I didn't really like it.
Do we have a chance to see public repo with your efforts?
It's about duplication of work.
Just arrived home
Thank you. I will get my packages updated for this. I was depending on
the custom-compiled llvm2.8 and I didn't really like it.
Do we have a chance to see public repo with your efforts?
It's about duplication of work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
llvm 2.8 is now available in sid and wheezy, has there been any progress?
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 11-05-03 9:18 PM, James Healy wrote:
llvm 2.8 is now available in sid and wheezy, has there been any progress?
James
Aha!
Thank you. I will get my packages updated for this. I was depending on
the custom-compiled llvm2.8 and I didn't really like it.
I'll also need a new mentor/sponsor
However, I tried to build your package (from github source with
git-buildpackage) and it misses build dependencies on Debian unstable
right now (most notably llvm-2.8*). Is ir a hard dependency, or it would
build with llvm-2.7?
Would you prapare a Debian unstable package? Alternatively you
Hi Antono,
Antono Vasiljev escreveu isso aí:
I prepared rubinius package for Ubuntu Natty[1]. You can get source from
my github repository[2].
Some people reported that it works for them. However I think it need
more work and comments from more experienced debian developer.
[1]:
My package is waiting for my mentor to check it over.
I suppose I could make a repository and publish that.
-Steven
On 2011-03-29, at 10:01 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Hi Antono,
Antono Vasiljev escreveu isso aí:
I prepared rubinius package for Ubuntu Natty[1]. You can get source from
my
My package is waiting for my mentor to check it over.
I suppose I could make a repository and publish that.
I suppose that would be a good idea, yes. But maybe you could contribute
to Antono's packaging effort instead?
Why would I contribute to a packaging effort that is newer than my
[snip]
When you do you plan to make your code public? What are your plans
regarding co-maintainance? What are your plans regarding ruby libraries
packaged in Debian?
Maintaining a package that is part of the
Ruby toolchain requires strong commitment and availability. I don't want
to
On 29/03/11 at 10:02 -0700, Steven Baker wrote:
My package is waiting for my mentor to check it over.
I suppose I could make a repository and publish that.
I suppose that would be a good idea, yes. But maybe you could contribute
to Antono's packaging effort instead?
Also, please don't
On 29/03/11 at 11:36 -0700, Steven Baker wrote:
My package is waiting for my mentor to check it over.
I suppose I could make a repository and publish that.
I suppose that would be a good idea, yes. But maybe you could contribute
to Antono's packaging effort instead?
Why would I
On 29/03/11 at 12:20 -0700, Steven Baker wrote:
I have been waiting for about a month for mentor to check over most recent
stuff. I will ping him today and see if I should try something new.
Why don't you put the package on mentors.d.n or somewhere on the web?
Unless your secret mentor is
I prepared rubinius package for Ubuntu Natty[1]. You can get source from
my github repository[2].
Some people reported that it works for them. However I think it need
more work and comments from more experienced debian developer.
[1]: https://launchpad.net/~antono/+archive/rubinius
[2]:
On 29/12/10 at 00:03 -0800, Steven Baker wrote:
Yes. I built 1.2 packages, meeting with my mentor in a day or two to
get them uploaded.
Hi,
Any news on that?
- Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Yes. I built 1.2 packages, meeting with my mentor in a day or two to
get them uploaded.
Thanks,
-Steven
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 5:40 PM, James Healy ji...@deefa.com wrote:
Rubinius 1.2 has been released, it'd be awesome to have it available
in debian (even experimental for now).
Has there
Rubinius 1.2 has been released, it'd be awesome to have it available
in debian (even experimental for now).
Has there been any progress?
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
On 25/09/10 at 12:40 -0700, Steven Baker wrote:
Hello,
Just got a bug fixed yesterday, and will have the test packages ready
to go in the next few days.
Ping?
- Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Steven!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Do you have anything to test yet?
Ciao,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello,
Just got a bug fixed yesterday, and will have the test packages ready
to go in the next few days.
-Steven
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
Hi Steven!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Do you have anything to test yet?
Ciao,
--
Martin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steven R. Baker steven-deb...@stevenrbaker.com
* Package name: rubinius
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Evan Phoenix ephoe...@engineyard.com
* URL : http://www.rubini.us/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++, Ruby
29 matches
Mail list logo
