Bug#595963: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#595963: RFP: yanone-kaffeesatz -- TTF and OTF font in four weights

2010-09-20 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org): fonts-$foundry-$fontfamilyname sounds way more sane to me for source packages, yes. I just wrote in an ITP that we could probably go this way for wheezy. So if that font is not intended for squeeze, I'd say let's choose 'fonts-yanone-kaffeesatz' for the

Bug#595963: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#595963: RFP: yanone-kaffeesatz -- TTF and OTF font in four weights

2010-09-08 Thread Nicolas Spalinger
Axel Beckert wrote: Hi, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org): Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: yanone-kaffeesatz Could that be turned out into ttf-yanone-kaffeesatz? I deliberately did not choose ttf-yanone-kaffeesatz since the name

Bug#595963: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#595963: RFP: yanone-kaffeesatz -- TTF and OTF font in four weights

2010-09-08 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Nicolas Spalinger wrote: Well, it you look at upstream descriptions there is an intended difference of usage between the OTF and the TTF. Yep. One being specific to another OS' rendering environment. Do we really need both debianized? Well, as far as I read it one is optimized for DTP