> I don't know what kind of patches those are, but this obviously need to be
> discussed with each relevant maintainer. We can't decide for them. But
> duplicating packages would be really bad.
I think this is because Squeeze was being prepared for release, so
everybody was revolving around that g
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Before resuming this process I believe we need to figure out which way
> to go. I assume it's patching current Debian packages. As Raphael
I don't know what kind of patches those are, but this obviously need to be
discussed with each relevant maintainer.
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Jon Dowland wrote:
>> Has there been any progress on this ITP?
>
> Not that I know. You're welcome to help, Adnan is doing lots of other
> stuff already and pkg-ayatana is largely understaffed in general.
Thank you Raphael for this very thoughtful observation, as it is
absol
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adnan Hodzic
Date: Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#609278: [Pkg-ayatana-devel] progress on Unity?
To: Raphael Hertzog , 609...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Jon Dowland , pkg-ayatana-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011,
Hello Jon,
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Jon Dowland wrote:
> Has there been any progress on this ITP?
Not that I know. You're welcome to help, Adnan is doing lots of other
stuff already and pkg-ayatana is largely understaffed in general.
(I encouraged its creation but I can't take a leading role)
Cheer
5 matches
Mail list logo
