Hi,
I have not yet found any link to a VCS where RStudio packaging is going
on nor what the packaging status might be. It would be great to have an
update about this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Reading this bug's history it seems the removal of gwt from unstable
stalled the packaging effort. I think gwt could be re-added to unstable
since there is a new upstream release and the removal happened due to
bugs not fixed for a long time.
I would be interested in using an RStudio package and I
Hi,
any news about rstudio packaging? Something we could drain from
${VCS}.debian.org for testing?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 06:45:11PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Dear Dirk and others,
>
> On May 14 2014, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > On 14 May 2014 at 17:08, Rogé
On 15 May 2014 at 10:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
| simple. I agree that the pure fact Dirk is stating is true: Yes, we
| are lagging behind upstream.
And you make that a "policy". I don't think that flies. Remember this line:
"Our priorities are our users"
| My point is that we are deliv
[Bug CCed since the discussion was started there - should be moved
to Debian Med devel list, but I personally do not have to say much
more probably.]
Hi Charles,
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 04:24:06PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Part of the bitrot might be caused by the fact that on my side,
Hi Dirk,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:56:06PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 14 May 2014 at 22:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
> | Why not commiting your work to Debian Science repository and let others
> | have a look? I'd be interested and might spent some time cycles into it.
>
> Well if you
On 14 May 2014 at 18:45, Rogério Brito wrote:
| Dear Dirk and others,
|
| On May 14 2014, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 14 May 2014 at 17:08, Rogério Brito wrote:
| > | Anyway, I can push the *super* embrionary packaging that I have so far. I
| > | would like some help with the maintainance of
Dear Dirk and others,
On May 14 2014, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 14 May 2014 at 17:08, Rogério Brito wrote:
> | Anyway, I can push the *super* embrionary packaging that I have so far. I
> | would like some help with the maintainance of this package since I have
> | barely any time left with th
On 14 May 2014 at 17:08, Rogério Brito wrote:
| Is there anybody that wants to get rstudio packaged, even if in a "dirty"
| state, while other dependencies are not yet in Debian?
|
| I just started looking at the source and it seems to mostly compile with
| what we have in Debian, but I don't kno
On 14 May 2014 at 22:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Why not commiting your work to Debian Science repository and let others
| have a look? I'd be interested and might spent some time cycles into it.
Well if you have spare cycles, would you mind looking at the various r-cran-*
packages some of which
Hi Rogério
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:08:32PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> On Sep 06 2013, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > Checked with upstream over IM, and yes, they do use Java to generate 300k of
> > Javascript. So GWT is used for that.
>
> Is there anybody that wants to get rst
Hi there.
On Sep 06 2013, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 6 September 2013 at 05:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | On 6 September 2013 at 16:38, Lifeng Sun wrote:
> | | IMHO, the most difficult part to get rstudio in Debian official
> | | archive is that rstudio build-depends on several (5 or so) Jav
On 6 September 2013 at 05:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 6 September 2013 at 16:38, Lifeng Sun wrote:
| | Hi,
| |
| | On 02:58 Fri 09/06/13 Sep , Rogério Brito wrote:
| | > If there is indeed interest in packaging R Studio, Lifeng, can you say so?
| | > The last public activity from you
On 6 September 2013 at 16:38, Lifeng Sun wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On 02:58 Fri 09/06/13 Sep , Rogério Brito wrote:
| > If there is indeed interest in packaging R Studio, Lifeng, can you say so?
| > The last public activity from yours was making this bug an ITP on 12 Oct
| > 2012, which soon will be 1
Hi,
On 02:58 Fri 09/06/13 Sep , Rogério Brito wrote:
> If there is indeed interest in packaging R Studio, Lifeng, can you say so?
> The last public activity from yours was making this bug an ITP on 12 Oct
> 2012, which soon will be 12 months old.
A short answer is "yes", but ...
IMHO, the mo
Hi there.
On Jun 18 2013, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
> * Benj. Mako Hill wrote [19.06.12 17:11]:
> Hi,
> any status update for the RStudio package?
Indeed, R studio is probably one of the important packages related to R that
is missing from our archives and, to avoid "holding a lock forever", I just
we
Any progress to report on getting RStudio in Debian? The software has
a full debian/ directory and well functioning debs available on the
website so I wonder what the hold up is. If we think its unlikely that
others will get to it, mayb ewe can switch it back to an RFP or I can
help look into doing
17 matches
Mail list logo
