Hi Salvador
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:29:26AM +0200, Salvador Fandino wrote:
Nowadays there are alternatives to Net::SSH::Perl with out dependencies
on non-free packages:
- Net::SSH2 (already packed for debian)
- Net::OpenSSH
- Net::OpenSSH::Compat::Perl (providing the same API as
Nowadays there are alternatives to Net::SSH::Perl with out dependencies
on non-free packages:
- Net::SSH2 (already packed for debian)
- Net::OpenSSH
- Net::OpenSSH::Compat::Perl (providing the same API as Net::SSH::Perl)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Package: wnpp
Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libnet-ssh-perl-perl
Version : 1.34
Upstream Author : David Robins dbrob...@cpan.org
* URL :
Why not name it *libnet-ssh-perl*?
(As libwww-perl ;-)
2011/10/17 Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
Package: wnpp
Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name:
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:28:04PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
Why not name it *libnet-ssh-perl*
Thanks for feedback. I woud name it this why since libnet-ssh-perl is
already present, for Net::SSH. In Perl policy we have the naming
scheme covering this:
Net::SSH - libnet-ssh-perl (packaged
If so, I'm for perl-perl :-)
Go ahead!
2011/10/18 Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
Net::SSH - libnet-ssh-perl (packaged since 2001).
Net::SSH::Perl - libnet-ssh-perl-perl
I agree, the doubled -perl at the end may be a bit confusing, but is
derived from the name.
6 matches
Mail list logo