Kees Cook k...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:23:28AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
But still it'd be useful to have such a package for dh_* scripts that
have no obvious location.
If Joey has no objections, I believe you should just go ahead creating
debhelper-extras (or
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:01:04AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Yup, this is the reason I dared raising the option in the first
place. (Though, even if this weren't the case, I'd be up for helping
maintain such a package, but thankfully, doing so would be an easy job.)
So, if I understand it
Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org writes:
Then we only need a package name, possibly finding other scripts apart
from dh_apparmor (perhaps even poking the maintainers of various dh_*
scripts if they'd consider merging into a single thing), and a
maintainer (I'm willing to help with that,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:23:28AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
But still it'd be useful to have such a package for dh_* scripts that
have no obvious location.
If Joey has no objections, I believe you should just go ahead creating
debhelper-extras (or whatever name pleases you),
Hi!
As I mentioned earlier[1] in the bugreport, I had to work with more than
one package that could've used dh_apparmor, and that's at least one too
many for my taste. So I've been thinking about a way to resolve this
situation, and - if possible - avoid similar issues in the future,
without
Hi Gergely,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:03:00PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
We could start with dh_apparmor (since packaging a single tool like that
separately does not make much sense to me), and add others as the need
arises.
What do you all think?
If the ABI of the dh_* tools is
Kees Cook wrote:
If the ABI of the dh_* tools is considered stable and exportable, I have
no problem with this. If debhelper will change its ABI in the future,
then this separate package is going to be a pain to maintain.
Debhelper has had a stable, documented ABI for 12+ years;
there are
Joey Hess jo...@debian.org writes:
Kees Cook wrote:
If the ABI of the dh_* tools is considered stable and exportable, I have
no problem with this. If debhelper will change its ABI in the future,
then this separate package is going to be a pain to maintain.
Debhelper has had a stable,
8 matches
Mail list logo
