Hi,
On Tue, February 7, 2012 3:09 pm, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> It could be named db-adminer, but my opinion is that we should rather
> keep the upstream name adminer. The short description, long description and
> debtags will be enough to clearly indicate that this is a database
> administration to
Medhamsh, 2012-02-07 15:03+0530:
> > In any case, maybe the package could be renamed to reflect that this
> > is not an "adminer", but a mysql-adminer?
>
> Martin, that would be a good idea. But adminer can be used to adminster
> MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, MS SQL and Oracle.
It could be named db-
Hi,
On Tue, February 7, 2012 2:41 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Medhamsh [2012.02.07.1016 +0100]:
>> It is only a database administration tool. Any database user
>> can login and create/edit tables etc.
>
> I wish I hadn't said anything.
>
>
> In any case, maybe the package could be re
also sprach Medhamsh [2012.02.07.1016 +0100]:
> It is only a database administration tool. Any database user
> can login and create/edit tables etc.
I wish I hadn't said anything.
In any case, maybe the package could be renamed to reflect that this
is not an "adminer", but a mysql-adminer?
--
On Tue, February 7, 2012 2:26 pm, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> martin f krafft, 2012-02-07 09:24+0100:
>> I may well be wrong, but how else would it be used to administer
>> a system?
>
> This is only a database administration tool, not a system administration
> one like Webmin. Medhamsh, can you confir
also sprach Tanguy Ortolo [2012.02.07.0956 +0100]:
> > I may well be wrong, but how else would it be used to administer
> > a system?
>
> This is only a database administration tool, not a system administration
> one like Webmin. Medhamsh, can you confirm?
In that case, I really did confuse this
martin f krafft, 2012-02-07 09:24+0100:
> I may well be wrong, but how else would it be used to administer
> a system?
This is only a database administration tool, not a system administration
one like Webmin. Medhamsh, can you confirm?
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo
| `-'Debian Developer
also sprach Tanguy Ortolo [2012.02.07.0847 +0100]:
> Does it actually run as root? This being a database administration tool,
> I do not see why it would require root privileges, and it should be able
> to work just fine as www-data.
I may well be wrong, but how else would it be used to administe
martin f krafft, 2012-02-06 16:11+0100:
> With audit I meant: the code runs as root. Did someone ever check
> the code for security bugs?
Does it actually run as root? This being a database administration tool,
I do not see why it would require root privileges, and it should be able
to work just f
On Mon, February 6, 2012 8:41 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> With audit I meant: the code runs as root. Did someone ever check
> the code for security bugs?
Oh, this. Along with me If some one else could do it, it would be a
better checkpoint. I will write more if I encounter any. May be I
should r
also sprach Medhamsh [2012.02.06.1614 +0100]:
> Audited as in where? I spent some time on reading about it and it's website
> gives a comparison matrix of phpMyAdmin and adminer. There were some issues
> stated in phpMyAdmin which refer to Clickjacking and referer leakage. It
> also showed that th
On Mon, February 6, 2012 7:59 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> Yes there can be. But PHP-based web administration of Linux systems,
> inherently requiring root access, remain a nightmare. The risks are IMHO
> huge and a distro like Debian might want to ask itself whether protecting
> its users might n
also sprach Medhamsh [2012.02.06.1520 +0100]:
> On Mon, February 6, 2012 7:31 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> > This just sounds like one massive nightmare. I wish phpMyAdmin would
> > instead be removed.
>
> Usually, cant there be different packages for the same purpose? I believe
> I have seen som
Hello,
I have been personally using this for some time. I also used phpMyAdmin
previously. I thought this package is worth getting into Debian repos.
On Mon, February 6, 2012 7:31 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> This just sounds like one massive nightmare. I wish phpMyAdmin would
> instead be remove
also sprach medhamsh [2012.02.06.1432 +0100]:
> Adminer (formerly phpMinAdmin) is a full-featured database management
> tool written in PHP. Conversely to phpMyAdmin, it consist of a single
> file ready to deploy to the target server.
This just sounds like one massive nightmare. I wish phpMyAd
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: medhamsh
* Package name: adminer
Version : 3.3.3
Upstream Author : Jakub Vrana
* URL : http://adminer.org
* License : (GPL, Apache)
Programming Lang: (PHP)
Description : Light weight Web based database administr
16 matches
Mail list logo
