Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thilo Uttendorfer
* Package name: logsurfer
Version : 1.8
Upstream Author : Kerry Thompson
* URL : http://www.crypt.gen.nz/logsurfer/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Monitoring system logs in re
also sprach Thilo Uttendorfer [2012.04.29.2306 +0200]:
> * Package name: logsurfer
> Version : 1.8
> Upstream Author : Kerry Thompson
> * URL : http://www.crypt.gen.nz/logsurfer/
> * License : BSD
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : Monitoring system
Am 30.04.2012 um 11:21 schrieb martin f krafft:
> also sprach Thilo Uttendorfer [2012.04.29.2306
> +0200]:
>> * Package name: logsurfer
>> Version : 1.8
>> Upstream Author : Kerry Thompson
>> * URL : http://www.crypt.gen.nz/logsurfer/
>> * License : BSD
>> Prog
Hi
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:13:31PM +0200, Thilo Uttendorfer wrote:
> Am 30.04.2012 um 11:21 schrieb martin f krafft:
> > also sprach Thilo Uttendorfer [2012.04.29.2306
> > +0200]:
> >> * Package name: logsurfer
> >> Version : 1.8
> >> Upstream Author : Kerry Thompson
> >> * URL
Am 01.05.2012 um 06:42 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:13:31PM +0200, Thilo Uttendorfer wrote:
>> Am 30.04.2012 um 11:21 schrieb martin f krafft:
>>> also sprach Thilo Uttendorfer [2012.04.29.2306
>>> +0200]:
* Package name: logsurfer
Version : 1.8
also sprach Thilo Uttendorfer [2012.04.30.1513 +0200]:
> Although it probably could replace logcheck, I would not recommend
> it to use it that way because the syntax is much more complex.
I don't quite understand. Are you telling me that I will not be able
to properly configure logsurfer (even i
Am 01.05.2012 um 13:57 schrieb martin f krafft:
> also sprach Thilo Uttendorfer [2012.04.30.1513
> +0200]:
>> Although it probably could replace logcheck, I would not recommend
>> it to use it that way because the syntax is much more complex.
>
> I don't quite understand. Are you telling me that
also sprach Thilo Uttendorfer [2012.05.01.1429 +0200]:
> No, this is a misunderstanding: If you configure logsurfer properly it
> can replace logcheck. I just would not use it that way (just my opinion),
> because the nice thing with logcheck is that the rules are very simple
> and a lot of other
8 matches
Mail list logo