Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-04-11 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: Just for the record, here are some source packages (taken directly from latest pkg-nvidia git) for your convenience:

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-04-10 Thread Aron Xu
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: Just for the record, here are some source packages (taken directly from latest pkg-nvidia git) for your convenience: http://www.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca/~b2c8/debian/pkg-nvidia-20130409/bumblebee_3.1-1.dsc

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-04-09 Thread Vincent Cheng
First off, sorry for the slow replies lately... On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote: [snip] Then could you add it to Debian's

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-04-09 Thread Vincent Cheng
Just for the record, here are some source packages (taken directly from latest pkg-nvidia git) for your convenience: http://www.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca/~b2c8/debian/pkg-nvidia-20130409/bumblebee_3.1-1.dsc http://www.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca/~b2c8/debian/pkg-nvidia-20130409/primus_0~20130225-1.dsc They're

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-04-04 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote: [snip] Then could you add it to Debian's git repo? Done. But in the process of building the packages I hit another issue [1], so please hold off (yet again) on uploading primus until it gets fixed. As an aside, I made a comment

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-04-03 Thread Vincent Cheng
Just a quick followup... On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: Aron, I'm unsure if you're aware of the pull

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-04-03 Thread Aron Xu
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick followup... On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Vincent Cheng

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-04-01 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: Aron, I'm unsure if you're aware of the pull request I've made upstream [1], but if you have anything you want changed upstream, please feel free to

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-31 Thread Aron Xu
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: Aron, I'm unsure if you're aware of the pull request I've made upstream [1], but if you have anything you want changed upstream, please feel free to jump into the conversation. I think by now we've sorted out more or

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Wednesday 20 March 2013 03:39 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: http://www.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca/~b2c8/debian/pkg-nvidia/bumblebee_3.1-1.dsc In debian/bumblebee.preinst: it states: If you are a novice, you are recommended to reinstall Ubuntu. Is this allowed by the Debian packaging guidelines? Sharing is

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-23 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi, First off, thanks for the bbswitch upload! On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: On Wednesday 20 March 2013 03:39 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: http://www.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca/~b2c8/debian/pkg-nvidia/bumblebee_3.1-1.dsc In debian/bumblebee.preinst: it

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Saturday 23 March 2013 03:02 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: I see no harm in trying to make my package compatible with both Debian and Ubuntu, as long as the changes are not overly obtrusive and don't break anything in Debian. I'm actually of the opinion that it's best to minimize diffs between

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-23 Thread Vincent Cheng
[Whoops, hit reply instead of reply to all. It's gmail's fault.] On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: On Saturday 23 March 2013 03:02 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: I see no harm in trying to make my package compatible with both Debian and Ubuntu, as long as

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Vincent, There might be merits of following the Ubuntu + Debian route _today_. Maybe. But for the project, I fail to see the benefits. I do not see myself convinced to mix packaging decisions for 2 different distributions with different intent. Take a look at the Dependencies in

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-23 Thread Aron Xu
Hi Ritesh, Vincent, I've cut off quotes as my reply does not apply to specific sentences... I agree that keeping a package simple have benefits, but I don't think making our life harder is a good reason to cut down such stuff. Our current packaging are largely based on upstream's efforts, and we

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Saturday 23 March 2013 06:13 PM, Aron Xu wrote: I've cut off quotes as my reply does not apply to specific sentences... I agree that keeping a package simple have benefits, but I don't think making our life harder is a good reason to cut

Bug#673424: Fwd: Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-23 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi, On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: As much as I want and will use bumblebee, I do not agree with the justification. Let's just disagree. :-) You sponsor the packages bumblebee and primus so that it gets in the queue. Fair enough. Regardless,

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-22 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: On Thursday 21 March 2013 10:34 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: NEWS is already installed by dh_installdocs. But if you want to use dh_installchangelogs for that instead, I'm fine with that; do you want me to remove

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-21 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Wednesday 20 March 2013 03:39 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: http://www.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca/~b2c8/debian/pkg-nvidia/bbswitch_0.6-1.dsc Here's some feedback for package bbswitch. * Upstream changelog is not shipped. Lintian warns about it. Good to have. I have fixed it and will send you the patch. You

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-21 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: On Wednesday 20 March 2013 03:39 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: http://www.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca/~b2c8/debian/pkg-nvidia/bbswitch_0.6-1.dsc Here's some feedback for package bbswitch. * Upstream changelog is not shipped.

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-21 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Thursday 21 March 2013 10:34 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: NEWS is already installed by dh_installdocs. But if you want to use dh_installchangelogs for that instead, I'm fine with that; do you want me to remove debian/docs as well then? I don't see the point of having duplicate copies. Yes.

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-20 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote: It's very much appreciated if you can help on sponsoring, as my personal time isn't very abundant recently so it could be a quite long delay waiting my uploads... But I'll keep an eye on the package and responded as soon as I

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-20 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, Ok, I think I've (finally) gotten everything dealt with, including the conffile issue (I ended up deciding to use the rest of Ralf's patch, and prepared a pull request upstream for all my changes [1]). Tested the packages and they work for me, so Aron/Ritesh, if one of you could review

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Wednesday 20 March 2013 03:39 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: Ok, I think I've (finally) gotten everything dealt with, including the conffile issue (I ended up deciding to use the rest of Ralf's patch, and prepared a pull request upstream for all my changes [1]). Tested the packages and they work

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-19 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, I suppose a better way of explaining why watching /proc/acpi/bbswitch isn't reliable is by referencing the differences between how the virtualgl and primus backends work. Virtualgl will always cause the secondary X server to be spawned (everything is rendered on the secondary X server

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-19 Thread Aron Xu
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: On Tuesday 19 March 2013 01:35 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: # Need functions from primus libGL to take precedence export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${PRIMUS_libGL}${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} That line was already

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-19 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Ralf Jung p...@ralfj.de wrote: Hi, I suppose a better way of explaining why watching /proc/acpi/bbswitch isn't reliable is by referencing the differences between how the virtualgl and primus backends work. Virtualgl will always cause the secondary X server to

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-18 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: On Thursday 28 February 2013 11:16 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Installed, rebooted and everything seems to be working fine. This is on the following platform: rrs@zan:~$ uname -a Linux zan 3.7-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Monday 18 March 2013 11:44 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: I wasn't actually done with primus' packaging; for some reason I kept on getting a strange error (primus: fatal: failed to open secondary X display) every time I tried running primusrun, even though it works with the optirun+virtualgl

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-18 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: On Monday 18 March 2013 11:44 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: I wasn't actually done with primus' packaging; for some reason I kept on getting a strange error (primus: fatal: failed to open secondary X display) every time

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-18 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, By the way, with bumblebee + primus installed, you still will want to recommend users to call apps with the optirun interface. primus just sets some library variables and calls the application. The application is never run on the discrete nvidia card. Errr, no. As I understand it,

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Monday 18 March 2013 01:15 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: Try testing with: # apt-get install mesa-utils $ optirun -b primus glxgears -info $ primusrun glxgears -info Okay!! I got uniform results but I had to again uncomment the following line. Without it, it was running on the Intel card. #

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-18 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: On Monday 18 March 2013 01:15 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: Try testing with: # apt-get install mesa-utils $ optirun -b primus glxgears -info $ primusrun glxgears -info Okay!! I got uniform results but I had to again

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 01:35 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: # Need functions from primus libGL to take precedence export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${PRIMUS_libGL}${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} That line was already uncommented out in the script shipped by the package... Oh!! I must have missed that.

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Thursday 28 February 2013 11:16 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Installed, rebooted and everything seems to be working fine. This is on the following platform: rrs@zan:~$ uname -a Linux zan 3.7-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.7.8-1~experimental.1 x86_64 GNU/Linux rrs@zan:~$ lspci | grep NVIDIA

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-06 Thread Aron Xu
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Ralf Jung p...@ralfj.de wrote: Hi, Do you have enough manpower? I'd be happy to join the team. Help is appreciated! Packaging work isn't too much, but we are in need of manpower to test packages for different versions of Linux kernels and nvidia drivers...

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-03-01 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, Do you have enough manpower? I'd be happy to join the team. Help is appreciated! Packaging work isn't too much, but we are in need of manpower to test packages for different versions of Linux kernels and nvidia drivers... Sure, I can easily test on various kernels with the current

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-02-27 Thread Aron Xu
On Feb 26, 2013 6:40 PM, Ralf Jung p...@ralfj.de wrote: Hi, Both bbswitch and bumblebee has been uploaded to unstable, and is waiting in NEW queue for ftp team's review. Awesome. Are these the correct package repositories?

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-02-27 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote: Both bbswitch and bumblebee has been uploaded to unstable, and is waiting in NEW queue for ftp team's review. Awesome. Are these the correct package repositories?

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-02-27 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: I will start using them now and report issues, if any. Installed, rebooted and everything seems to be working fine. This is on the following platform: rrs@zan:~$ uname -a Linux zan 3.7-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP Debian

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-02-26 Thread Aron Xu
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Ralf Jung p...@ralfj.de wrote: Hi, what's the current state on this? There was a Bumblebee release today which no longer depends on VirtualGL, so libjpeg-turbo is not at all a blocker anymore. Please let me know if I can help, and how :) Kind regards, Ralf

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-02-26 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, Both bbswitch and bumblebee has been uploaded to unstable, and is waiting in NEW queue for ftp team's review. Awesome. Are these the correct package repositories? http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-nvidia/bbswitch.git;a=summary

Bug#673424: bbswitch packaging

2013-02-25 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, what's the current state on this? There was a Bumblebee release today which no longer depends on VirtualGL, so libjpeg-turbo is not at all a blocker anymore. Please let me know if I can help, and how :) Kind regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org