Hi.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:35:04PM +0200, chrysn wrote:
i intend to adopt this package.
i use it actively and prepared a version 3 update described in bug
#655039 -- my updated package is far from ready, and furthermore
outdated due to upstreams 4.0.1, but i don't want this useful
hello oliver,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:12:18PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
What's the current status on your side ?
i have not yet updated my packaging efforts since what is described in
[1] (in february).
Maybe we could envision some collaborative maintenance under the
umbrella of the
Hi.
chrysn chr...@fsfe.org writes:
hello oliver,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:12:18PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
What's the current status on your side ?
i have not yet updated my packaging efforts since what is described in
[1] (in february).
OK, so I'll have a deeper look.
Maybe we
Hi again.
Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@telecom-sudparis.eu writes:
chrysn chr...@fsfe.org writes:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:12:18PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
What's the current status on your side ?
i have not yet updated my packaging efforts since what is described in
[1] (in
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 03:33:00PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
Do you have an existing public git repo I could clone, to start with
(instead of reinjecting in an empty git-buidlpackage one) ?
i have set up a repository in collab-maint at [1] and reverted the last
commits that were required
i intend to adopt this package.
i use it actively and prepared a version 3 update described in bug
#655039 -- my updated package is far from ready, and furthermore
outdated due to upstreams 4.0.1, but i don't want this useful library to
get lost for debian.
if someone wants to adopt this package
6 matches
Mail list logo
