Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-04-02 Thread Per Andersson
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Per Andersson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote: >> On Monday 03 March 2014 23:17:22 Per Andersson wrote: >> >> Possible solutions: >> - create a package (upstream or debian) for gitlab custom lexer. In theory >> python-pygment plug

Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-04-02 Thread Per Andersson
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Monday 03 March 2014 23:17:22 Per Andersson wrote: >> There is also the issue of the custom lexer for github markup from >> pygments in vendors, I can't see that this is resolved in current packaging. >> >> Since the idea is to use this

Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-03-27 Thread Sytse Sijbrandij
You're welcome, let me know if there is anything else. On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Tuesday 25 March 2014 17:08:43 Sytse Sijbrandij wrote: >> Responding here since I only just subscribed to the mailinglist. >> >> Did you know that we dropped pygments for highlight

Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-03-26 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 17:08:43 Sytse Sijbrandij wrote: > Responding here since I only just subscribed to the mailinglist. > > Did you know that we dropped pygments for highlight.js in our previous > release? No. This means that we need not to worry about the gitlab lexer. Thanks for the heads

Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-03-25 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday 03 March 2014 23:17:22 Per Andersson wrote: > There is also the issue of the custom lexer for github markup from > pygments in vendors, I can't see that this is resolved in current packaging. > > Since the idea is to use this for GitLab where ruby-github-markup will > use this custom lex

Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-03-17 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hello Sorry for the late reply, last week was vacation time. On Monday 03 March 2014 23:17:22 Per Andersson wrote: > My intention was to push this custom lexer upstream. > > https://github.com/tmm1/pygments.rb/pull/77 > > Another way is of course to add this to the Debian pygments package (

Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-03-03 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! Nice that you picked up this work! On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Axel Wagner wrote: > Hi Dominique, > > I think the open issues should be fixed now. Could you please have a > look and upload if appropriate? debian/rules: removal of bundled jquery.js is from obsolete -doc package, update

Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-03-03 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Friday 28 February 2014 14:59:55 Axel Wagner wrote: > I think the open issues should be fixed now. Could you please have a > look and upload if appropriate? I had a quick look. There are still some issues: control: - you should put yourself in uploader - update standards version to 3.9.5 cop

Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-02-28 Thread Axel Wagner
Hi Dominique, I think the open issues should be fixed now. Could you please have a look and upload if appropriate? Best, Axel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.

Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-02-24 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday 23 February 2014 20:32:10 Axel Wagner wrote: > I agree with Gergely Nagy, that this is a > little bit puzzling, but warranted given that the gem is called that. Agreed. Better stick with a consistent naming with respect to upstream gem names. Even if the resulting name is lackluster. W

Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-02-23 Thread Axel Wagner
Hi, I'll hunt down proper licenses for these two files then. >> • The ruby-pygments.rb thingy This obviously wasn't really clear. I was refering to a comment in the rejection notes about the name of the package (ruby-pygments.rb as opposed to ruby-pygments). I agree with Gergely Nagy, that this

Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-02-23 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hello Axel Please keep the original debian bug in copy for reference On Sunday 23 February 2014 02:42:45 you wrote: > • vendor/custom_lexers/github.py has a bsd-license mentioned in the > header, but there is no LICENSE file or verbatim license in the > header. I read over several docs about the

Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-02-21 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Friday 21 February 2014 17:00:01 Axel Wagner wrote: > If I'm correct the way to move forward would > be addressing the issues raised in [1]? Yes. The are serious, but easy to fix issues. Thanks for your help -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumo

Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-02-21 Thread Axel Wagner
Hi Dominique, Dominique Dumont writes: > Axel, if you're willing to take over packaging of ruby-pygments.rb, I'll find > the time to sponsor this package. thanks, that is very kind. If I'm correct the way to move forward would be addressing the issues raised in [1]? I will have a look at that t

Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb

2014-02-21 Thread Dominique Dumont
Axel, if you're willing to take over packaging of ruby-pygments.rb, I'll find the time to sponsor this package. All the best -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb