Hi Petter,
sorry about the delay. I was waiting for a review from Bas (or another DD).
The package is also currently stuck at version 2.5.0, due to a lack of time on
my side, but I'll try to prepare and push an update ASAP.
The package is on mentors.debian.net, but you also need to get all the
Hi. What is the status for getting Cura into Debian? What is holding up
the upload?
I need it for a project, and would love to get official Debian packages for
it. If a sponsor is needed, feel free to get in touch. My sponsoring
preferences
are available from
Hi,
after going through another series of revisions and some cleanup, here is the
set of Cura 2.5 packages for review:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libarcus
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsavitar
https://mentors.debian.net/package/uranium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 08:57:54AM +0200, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> I just found a few more packages to build:
> https://github.com/Ultimaker/cura-build/tree/master/projects
>
> fdm_materials seems relatively important, I packaged it and added it as
Hi,
I just found a few more packages to build:
https://github.com/Ultimaker/cura-build/tree/master/projects
fdm_materials seems relatively important, I packaged it and added it as a
"Recommends" dependency to Cura. Cura will work without the definitions, but
having them makes it much more
> I agree this is the best way; my point was that you should not have a
> repository on github with a copy of the source, and the watch file should
> point
> to Ultimaker's github. Having a repository with the packaging is good. You
> can also host that in our team repository on Alioth. You
> Ah yes, clipper has weird and annoying naming. I talked to upstream about it,
> but they don't want to change it. I think it had something to do with a
> package naming conflict in Red Hat. In any case, the package is called
> libpolyclipping. There is a pkg-config file with it, but it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 11:36:37PM +0200, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> > Of course it is still useful to have your packaging (the debian directory)
> > under version control as well, and using names for those releases also
> > makes sense. If you want to
>> I'll probably settle for debian-2.3.1 (branches) and debian-2.3.1-1
>> (tags).
>
> Ah, I see. I think you should use upstream's releases anyway; if you need
> to make changes for the packaging, they should just be part of the package,
> not a fork from upstream. Especially if the only change
> Any reason you took this off-list? I'm not sending your mail back to it
> without your permission, but if it was a mistake, feel free to post any of my
> replies back to the list as well.
I'm sorry, that wasn't my intention. I believe one of your responses was
addressed to me personally, so I
And here's my (updated) response to Rock's comments:
> libArcus
>
>
> debian/changelog
>
>
> * There seems to be a line in the changelog that is too long, it'd be
>nice to split it into two so it fits into the "80 character limit".
Done.
> * Typically, new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:04:21AM +0200, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> > It looks like this has been forgotten? I would like to get Cura into
> > Debian,
> > so if there's anything I can do to help, let me know.
>
> I'm sorry for the lack of action
Hi,
> It looks like this has been forgotten? I would like to get Cura into Debian,
> so if there's anything I can do to help, let me know.
I'm sorry for the lack of action on my part, progress was stalled since some
of the criticised points are a bit difficult to fix, and I've been too busy to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
It looks like this has been forgotten? I would like to get Cura into Debian,
so if there's anything I can do to help, let me know.
I also have some comments on the comments:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:51:52PM +0100, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> > *
Hi Rock,
Here are my comments, I must say I don't use the software so I only
checked the building and the packaging. I trust you are testing that
once installed all four packages perform as expected :).
Thanks for the review!
I'll comment below.
> libArcus
>
>
> debian/changelog
>
Hi Gregor,
Here are my comments, I must say I don't use the software so I only
checked the building and the packaging. I trust you are testing that
once installed all four packages perform as expected :).
libArcus
debian/changelog
* There seems to be a line in the
Hi Alvaro,
I'm sorry it took me this long to start reviewing your work. I was about to
try to build your packages but I haven't been able to figure out how to do it.
How do you build your packages? Do you use git-buildpackage? I'm missing a
branch named "upstream" or something similar. A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gregor,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:02:26PM +0200, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> > I can help you with that. If you choose to maintain it in the 3-D printer
> > team, others in the team can also help you out with that.
>
> Very good, how do I sign up? :)
18 matches
Mail list logo
