Bug#722130: [pkg-otr-team] gajim-plugin-otr

2014-04-04 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Dmitry Smirnov wrote (03 Apr 2014 20:41:07 GMT) : Very nice, thanks. I'd like to let you know about gajim-plugin-otr (RFP #722130) that I packaged some time ago. It is pretty much ready and only need someone to take ownership. I would personally be happy to see you upload the Gajim OTR

Bug#722130: [pkg-otr-team] gajim-plugin-otr

2014-04-04 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:23:19 intrigeri wrote: I would personally be happy to see you upload the Gajim OTR plugin, and become the primary maintainer for it, under our team's umbrella. I'm not that keen to do that. Not yet. I did packaging over 6 months ago and it would have been uploaded long

Bug#722130: [pkg-otr-team] gajim-plugin-otr

2014-04-04 Thread Boris Pek
Hi everyone, 3. I see you've called the source package gajim-plugins. If the idea is to potentially maintain a bunch of non-OTR Gajim plugins in the source package, then I doubt it's appropriate to put it under the OTR team's umbrella. So, perhaps a dedicated source package would

Bug#722130: [pkg-otr-team] gajim-plugin-otr

2014-04-04 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 21:30:05 Boris Pek wrote: Producing per plugin binary packages is a bad idea in this case. It increases the size of Packages.*, Contents-* and Translation-* files in arhive too much, that affects all Debian users, but not only Gajim users. Also it increases the size of