Hi Mark!
I have seen that xemacs21 has been uploaded now, shouldn't we close
this ITP now?
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
Yeah, I know, which is part of why I used it for an example. I looked
at it yesterday and will probably adopt it at some point when I have
enough free time to do a proper job on the initial upload.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
Yeah, I know, which is part of why I used it for an example. I looked
at it yesterday and will probably adopt it at some point when I have
enough free
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 07:07:21PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
This is what Paul did: When writing just a single sentence it might be
reasonable to derive from a role which is good in general but not
helpful in specific cases. Please try to make reasonable
top-posting-bashings if necessary,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:49:49PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Why should Debian carry this package?
It's a package that we've carried since forever and which has a
userbase.
Which virtual packages are you planning to provide?
The same set as the package previously did: emacsen,
On 11/16/2013 11:43 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:49:49PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Why should Debian carry this package?
It's a package that we've carried since forever and which has a
userbase.
That's not really an argument. We've also had uae and e-uae
(the
Hi Mark,
2013/11/15 Mark Brown broo...@debian.org:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Brown broo...@debian.org
* Package name: xemacs21
Version : 21.4.22
Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
License : GPL
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:02:23PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2013/11/15 Mark Brown broo...@debian.org:
While develoment on xemacs is very slow these days I find it much more
visually pleasing than GNU emacs.
I know it is mostly personal preference, but what parts of xemacs are notably
Hi Mark,
2013/11/16 Mark Brown broo...@debian.org:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:02:23PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2013/11/15 Mark Brown broo...@debian.org:
While develoment on xemacs is very slow these days I find it much more
visually pleasing than GNU emacs.
I know it is mostly
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:01:48PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 11/16/2013 11:43 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
It's a package that we've carried since forever and which has a
userbase.
That's not really an argument. We've also had uae and e-uae
It is an argument; it might be one
On 11/16/2013 01:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Your first mail came with the argument that you think that
xemacs is more visually appealing than emacs. Honestly, emacs
is primarily a tool and not an optical gimmick. Visual
appearance does not bother most users, I'd guess. Most emacs
users use the
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
I agree that having the scroll bar on the left is quite unusual and it has
been
changed to having the scrollbar on the right by default in Emacs 24.
I don't have XEmacs installed and I'm not sure if the new colors in Emacs 24
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 01:30:01PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 11/16/2013 01:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Your assertations here both seem rather strong and unsupported,
especially the idea that people don't use Emacs in graphical mode - it
I have yet to see someone who does.
❦ 16 novembre 2013 13:30 CET, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de :
I have yet to see someone who does. I'm a long-time emacs user
and so are many of other developers I work together with and everyone
I know of who uses emacs as their primary editor doesn't use X11
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:05:31PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I was on my phone, thanks for the advice.
I laboriously quote-post from my phone all the time. Emails should be
optimised for the reader, rather than the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Brown broo...@debian.org
* Package name: xemacs21
Version : 21.4.22
Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, elisp
Description : highly
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Brown broo...@debian.org
* Package name: xemacs21
Version : 21.4.22
Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
* Package name: xemacs21
Version : 21.4.22
Wasn't this removed just one month ago?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725883
Berto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
* Package name: xemacs21
Version : 21.4.22
Wasn't this removed just one month ago?
Yes, this is why I'm ITPing it.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Only one note on this: xemacs21 was just removed some months ago, see
http://bugs.debian.org/725883 for details.
Yes, this is why it needs a new ITP.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
On Nov 15, 2013 9:10 AM, Mark Brown broo...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
* Package name: xemacs21
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:34AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
Don't top post.
Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
Yes, of course. Well, the one that was there when I looked is fixed,
I'll see if the BTS tells me about any open ones after the reupload.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:01:46PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:34AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
Don't top post.
I was on my phone, thanks for the advice.
Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
Yes, of course. Well, the one that
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
By making changes to the software.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
By making changes to the software.
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed.
This doesn't
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
By making changes to the software.
This discussion is getting a tad too
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
By making
On 15 November 2013 12:02, Mark Brown broo...@debian.org wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Brown broo...@debian.org
* Package name: xemacs21
Version : 21.4.22
Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
License
There was a nice bunch of (5-digit) bugs being closed with the removal,
they should be unarchived, reopened and handled properly if xemacs comes
back.
from https://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt:
=
[Date: Sun, 13 Oct
29 matches
Mail list logo
