Am Samstag, den 28.01.2017, 15:48 + schrieb Ghislain Vaillant:
> What is the status of your packaging effort for simpleitk?
I never got past early tests to compile it. At that time I had a
certain interest in the package but that veined.
>
> This bug was switched back to RFP in 2014.
Actual
What is the status of your packaging effort for simpleitk?
This bug was switched back to RFP in 2014. Please confirm whether you
are still working on it.
Thanks,
Ghis
Hi,
> You are referring to versioning of the tar balls found on SourceForge?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/simpleitk/files/SimpleITK/
Yes.
The numbering is only important for releases, at least I will not
package anything else.
A typical watch file entry for sourceforge looks like
http
Hello,
Thank you very much for considering packaging SimpleITK.
You are referring to versioning of the tar balls found on SourceForge?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/simpleitk/files/SimpleITK/
I unfortunately didn't pay to much attention to how that file name string was
created. It's either th
Hi Gert,
Thank you for your efforts!
I am passing along the versioning requests to the SimpleITK release
manager, Bradley Lowekamp.
Thanks,
Matt
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would look into packaging the software and ask on debian-med for
> sponsoring, but onl
Hi,
I would look into packaging the software and ask on debian-med for
sponsoring, but only after Easter - in case someone else has time and
wants to step forward with the packaging.
I've seen that the latest versions are 0.7.1.post1" and 0.8rc1. I would
ask you to stick to a version number
6 matches
Mail list logo
