Bug#750713: ITP: gf-complete -- Galois Field Arithmetic

2014-06-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thomas, looks like a nice target to be maintained in Debian Science. Kind regards Andreas. On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 04:15:48PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org * Package name: gf-complete Version

Bug#750713: ITP: gf-complete -- Galois Field Arithmetic

2014-06-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/17/2014 09:55 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 04:15:48PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org * Package name: gf-complete Version : 1.02~0+2014.05.git259d53ea590b Upstream Author : Jim

Bug#750713: ITP: gf-complete -- Galois Field Arithmetic

2014-06-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org * Package name: gf-complete Version : 1.02~0+2014.05.git259d53ea590b Upstream Author : Jim Plank pl...@cs.utk.edu * URL : https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete * License : BSD-3-clause

Bug#750713: ITP: gf-complete -- Galois Field Arithmetic

2014-06-06 Thread tony mancill
On 06/06/2014 01:15 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org * Package name: gf-complete Version : 1.02~0+2014.05.git259d53ea590b Upstream Author : Jim Plank pl...@cs.utk.edu * URL :

Bug#750713: ITP: gf-complete -- Galois Field Arithmetic

2014-06-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/06/2014 09:51 PM, tony mancill wrote: On 06/06/2014 01:15 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org * Package name: gf-complete Version : 1.02~0+2014.05.git259d53ea590b Upstream Author : Jim Plank pl...@cs.utk.edu

Bug#750713: ITP: gf-complete -- Galois Field Arithmetic

2014-06-06 Thread Eric Cooper
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 04:15:48PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: A Galois Field is defined over w-bit words and is termed GF(2w). As such, the elements of a Galois Field are the integers 0, 1, . . ., 2w − 1. These sentences should refer to 2^w (2 to the power w) rather than 2 times w. --