Bug#764401: Bug#783978: Bug#764401: Are you planning to take over mksh in Debian?

2015-05-01 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Kenneth Pronovici dixit: >>I'm not trying to be snarky here, but I'm a little lost. This package >>is orphaned. If you're no longer the package maintainer, why should >>it even matter to you whether upstream issues are tracked as Debian >>

Bug#764401: Are you planning to take over mksh in Debian?

2015-05-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Kenneth Pronovici dixit: >I filed the bug so nothing would get lost while the package is >orphaned, which seems like a reasonable thing to do. The next That may seem reasonable… >maintainer might very well have a different policy for Debian bugs >than you did. I would if it were my package. …

Bug#764401: Bug#783978: Bug#764401: Are you planning to take over mksh in Debian?

2015-05-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Kenneth Pronovici dixit: >I'm not trying to be snarky here, but I'm a little lost. This package >is orphaned. If you're no longer the package maintainer, why should >it even matter to you whether upstream issues are tracked as Debian >bugs? Because ① I’m upstream, ② I’m maintaining this packa

Bug#764401: Are you planning to take over mksh in Debian?

2015-05-01 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Kenneth Pronovici dixit: >>I'll file a Debian bug to document the improvements I asked for, just > Please DO NOT file Debian bugs for upstream issues in mksh, > only for packaging issues. > > This has been at the top of README.Debian for age

Bug#764401: Are you planning to take over mksh in Debian?

2015-05-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Kenneth Pronovici dixit: >I'll file a Debian bug to document the improvements I asked for, just Please DO NOT file Debian bugs for upstream issues in mksh, only for packaging issues. This has been at the top of README.Debian for ages. Debian bugs requesting functionality changes are likely to g

Bug#764401: Are you planning to take over mksh in Debian?

2015-05-01 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Dominik George wrote: >> Are you still planning to take over mksh in Debian? If not, I would >> like to take ownership of #76401 and maintain the package myself. I >> actively use ksh on Debian, and I don't want to see the packages go >> unmaintained. Also, I h

Bug#764401: Are you planning to take over mksh in Debian?

2015-05-01 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > Are you still planning to take over mksh in Debian? If not, I would > like to take ownership of #76401 and maintain the package myself. I > actively use ksh on Debian, and I don't want to see the packages go > unmaintained. Also, I have been talking with upstream about some > improvemen

Bug#764401: Are you planning to take over mksh in Debian?

2015-05-01 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
Hi Dominik, Are you still planning to take over mksh in Debian? If not, I would like to take ownership of #76401 and maintain the package myself. I actively use ksh on Debian, and I don't want to see the packages go unmaintained. Also, I have been talking with upstream about some improvements,