Bug#801253: how to handle not much used feature which depends on a deprecated technology

btw. thanks for recognizing/appreciating my rather small contributions :)

Bug#801253: how to handle not much used feature which depends on a deprecated technology

Hey, thanks a lot for your comments. Additionally, i'll ask upstream what they think about option 1) and 3), or generally how important that at_console block is for them. Again, thanks :) On 02/20/2016 03:38 AM, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi, thanks toogley for trying to tackle this issue. Paul

Bug#801253: how to handle not much used feature which depends on a deprecated technology

Hi, thanks toogley for trying to tackle this issue. Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:28 AM, toogley wrote: > > what do you think about that? Am i missing sth? > > I would go with 1) or 3) add support for systemd-logind and whatever > other options there are for people who don't like

Bug#801253: how to handle not much used feature which depends on a deprecated technology

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:28 AM, toogley wrote: > what do you think about that? Am i missing sth? I would go with 1) or 3) add support for systemd-logind and whatever other options there are for people who don't like systemd (ConsoleKit2 etc) and send that to upstream. -- bye, pabs https://wik

Bug#801253: how to handle not much used feature which depends on a deprecated technology

Hey. i want to fix this https://lintian.debian.org/tags/dbus-policy-at-console.html report in the wicd package. the concerning lines in the wicd source dir are (https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/wicd.git/tree/other/wicd.conf)