Bug#813562: Project maintainer here

Hello, Thank you for your e-mail. On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:35:10AM +, James R Barlow wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 at 17:05 Sean Whitton wrote: > I have a non-packaging question that I'd like to take this opportunity > to ask you: in your changelog entry

Bug#813562: Project maintainer here

I'd suggest putting ocrmypdf in a submodule with the Debian things outside. Then setup tools should pick up tags correctly rather than generating whatever "git describe" decides to call the current revision in your merged repo. On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 16:46 Sean Whitton

Bug#813562: Project maintainer here

Hello, On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:35:10AM +, James R Barlow wrote: > Oh, interesting. By smaller I take it mean the file size was reduced, not > resampling of images. Any chance you can send me an example input PDF? > (Dropbox > is best.) > > I did increase the JPEG quality that Ghostscript

Bug#813562: Project maintainer here

Let me know if you'd like to see any changes to help with packaging. If you are packaging around 3.1.1, versions older than 3.2.1 are incompatible with the recently released img2pdf 0.2.0; they require 0.1.5, and they do not enforce this dependency on their own. If you try to install any of them

Bug#813562: Project maintainer here

Hello, On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 03:23:39AM -0800, James R Barlow wrote: > Let me know if you'd like to see any changes to help with packaging. Thank you for your input, and for OCRmyPDF. I have a non-packaging question that I'd like to take this opportunity to ask you: in your changelog entry

Bug#813562: Project maintainer here

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 at 17:05 Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 03:23:39AM -0800, James R Barlow wrote: > > Let me know if you'd like to see any changes to help with packaging. > > Thank you for your input, and for OCRmyPDF. > > I have a