On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 17:51:05 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
> My understanding is that the package is only worth putting in Debian
> so that other software can make use of it. What part is needed, and
> how would this package be useful without the artwork?
We have emojione.js embedded in ruby-rails-asset
On 04-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Sunday, September 04 2016, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > On 02-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> >> Probably just a part of the upstream tarball needs to be packaged
> >> (the JS part).
> >
> > What about the artwork, which seems to be the main po
On Sunday, September 04 2016, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 02-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> Probably just a part of the upstream tarball needs to be packaged
>> (the JS part).
>
> What about the artwork, which seems to be the main point of the
> package? Or are you saying that this Debian pa
On 02-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Probably just a part of the upstream tarball needs to be packaged
> (the JS part).
What about the artwork, which seems to be the main point of the
package? Or are you saying that this Debian package would include none
of the artwork?
I have raised ht
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergio Durigan Junior
* Package name: libjs-emojione
Version : 2.2.6
Upstream Author : Ranks.com
* URL : https://github.com/Ranks/emojione
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript and Creative Commons Attribution
5 matches
Mail list logo
