Hello Lev,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:38:50PM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> 24.10.2016 22:27, Sean Whitton пишет:
> > Dear Lev,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:55:50AM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> >> (3) users will rather see their elpa-{bind-key,use-package}
> >> counterparts
> > I don't unders
Hi Sean,
24.10.2016 22:27, Sean Whitton пишет:
> Dear Lev,
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:55:50AM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
>> (3) users will rather see their elpa-{bind-key,use-package}
>> counterparts
> I don't understand this reasoning.
I don't get what you don't understand.
1. use-package
Hi Adam and Simon,
when it comes to binary packages, their names are elpa-bind-key and
elpa-use-package. Source package names in this case may be misleading, I
agree, but only for those who will see _only_ source package names.
Rationale for these _source_ package names was that (1) these are
upst
3 matches
Mail list logo
