Hi everyone,
I'm closing this ansible-doc ITP bug because it appears to obsolesced most
recently by:
ansible (2.7.5+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
- fix for CVE-2018-16876 (Closes: #916102)
* Remove any loading of external resources from the docs
* Only
Hi Toni,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 06:10:45PM +0800, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> > It's been a while since we made the decision not to pull from upstream's
> > git; Toni, I'd be happy to work with you on seeing if it's doable now.
>
Hi Harlan,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> It's been a while since we made the decision not to pull from upstream's
> git; Toni, I'd be happy to work with you on seeing if it's doable now.
I think I have a suitable package now, being as cheap as
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:14:59PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Toni Mueller writes:
> > I found them only on PyPI. Did you find them elsewhere?
>
> We get them from releases.ansible.com. Are the docs in the tarballs in
> PyPi?
Nope, there are only man pages.
Hey,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:04:12AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> > Unfortunately, we don't build ansible off of the git repository, but
> > rather from the released tarballs.
>
> I found them only on PyPI. Did you find
Toni Mueller writes:
> I found them only on PyPI. Did you find them elsewhere?
We get them from releases.ansible.com. Are the docs in the tarballs in
PyPi?
--
Harlan Lieberman-Berg
~hlieberman
Hi!
A happy new year, everyone!
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Unfortunately, we don't build ansible off of the git repository, but
> rather from the released tarballs.
I found them only on PyPI. Did you find them elsewhere?
> It's been a while since
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 05:38:50PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Ohai,
>
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> > "W. Martin Borgert" writes:
> > > Then why not make an additional binary package from the same
> > > source package? This way
Ohai,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> "W. Martin Borgert" writes:
> > Then why not make an additional binary package from the same
> > source package? This way ansible and its documentation would
> > not get out of sync.
>
>
"W. Martin Borgert" writes:
> Then why not make an additional binary package from the same
> source package? This way ansible and its documentation would
> not get out of sync.
Unfortunately, we don't build ansible off of the git repository, but
rather from the released
On 2016-12-31 10:52, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I am building from a git clone of the ansible repository, and, more
> specifically, from the tag v2.2.0.0-1.
Then why not make an additional binary package from the same
source package? This way ansible and its documentation would
not get out of sync.
>
Hi Evgeni,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:44:50PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 12:58:02AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > documentation. This package aims to supply the documentation in HTML
> > form offline, so one should not need to go to the aoupstream website to
> > read
Hi Toni,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 12:58:02AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Toni Mueller
>
> * Package name: ansible-doc
> Version : 2.2.0.0-1
> Upstream Author : RedHat
> * URL :
Toni Mueller writes:
> I hope I can collaborate with the maintainer of the ansible package to
> maintain this package.
For the record, the Ansible packaging team stands by to help however we
can.
Thanks, Toni!
Sincerely,
--
Harlan Lieberman-Berg
~hlieberman
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Toni Mueller
* Package name: ansible-doc
Version : 2.2.0.0-1
Upstream Author : RedHat
* URL : http://www.ansible.com/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: HTML, JavaScript
15 matches
Mail list logo