On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 13:24 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> I don't feel I can patch yarn myself to use execFile rather than
> exec: this is a change that upstream should implement.
I was asking if you could write a patch and send it to upstream for
inclusion upstream, not keep it in Debian.
--
by
Il 07/04/2018 11:23, Paul Wise ha scritto:
> On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 11:08 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote:
>
>> The suggestion has been rejected
>
> Actually, they said they would be happy to merge a patch:
>
> https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/5208#issuecomment-364890352
>
> I don't know JavaScr
On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 11:08 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> The suggestion has been rejected
Actually, they said they would be happy to merge a patch:
https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/5208#issuecomment-364890352
I don't know JavaScript well enough, could you write the patch?
--
bye,
pabs
The suggestion has been rejected by the nodejs module that is using puka that
I'm trying to package (yarn).
I'll now proceed with packaging puka.
I'll add a note to README.Debian in yarnpkg on this.
Paolo
4 matches
Mail list logo