Hi Xavier,
On 2020-10-12 10:34, Xavier wrote:
> over a year later, node-bunyan is still in NEW queue. I guess ftpmasters
> don't like it.
> I have no time to waste trying to get node-ldapjs in Debian 12 (too late
> now for bullseye), so I don't need node-bunyan anymore. Do you plan to
> embed it?
More than a year ago, Andrius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-08-21 11:55, Xavier wrote:
> > no real reason, node-bunyan is needed for node-ldapjs which is not
> > ready. It requires also node-dtrace-provider and node-vasync. Do you
> > need it for another reason ?
>
> Yes, I am investigating packaging
On 2019-08-21 15:51, Xavier wrote:
> I just pushed it to NEW queue with its dependencies.
Great, thanks a lot!
Andrius
Le 21/08/2019 à 11:03, mer...@debian.org a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-08-21 11:55, Xavier wrote:
>> no real reason, node-bunyan is needed for node-ldapjs which is not
>> ready. It requires also node-dtrace-provider and node-vasync. Do you
>> need it for another reason ?
>
> Yes, I am
Hi,
On 2019-08-21 11:55, Xavier wrote:
> no real reason, node-bunyan is needed for node-ldapjs which is not
> ready. It requires also node-dtrace-provider and node-vasync. Do you
> need it for another reason ?
Yes, I am investigating packaging possibilities of overleaf
dependencies. One of them,
Le 21/08/2019 à 10:47, mer...@debian.org a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> What is the current status of node-bunyan? Are there any blockers
> keeping it from being uploaded?
>
> Best,
> Andrius
Hi,
no real reason, node-bunyan is needed for node-ldapjs which is not
ready. It requires also
6 matches
Mail list logo
