Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name

2018-12-29 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 29.12.18 um 19:37 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 07:26:12PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> Am 29.12.18 um 19:11 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 05:41:47PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: If it is plain Xtensa Diamond 106Micro, then it should have

Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name

2018-12-29 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 07:26:12PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Am 29.12.18 um 19:11 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 05:41:47PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > >> If it is plain Xtensa Diamond 106Micro, then it should have proper > >> naming. If there are some differences,

Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name

2018-12-29 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 29.12.18 um 19:11 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 05:41:47PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> Am 29.12.18 um 16:56 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:02:01PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: Am 29.12.18 um 12:16 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: > On

Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name

2018-12-29 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 05:41:47PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Am 29.12.18 um 16:56 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:02:01PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > >> Am 29.12.18 um 12:16 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: > >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:11:31AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel

Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name

2018-12-29 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 29.12.18 um 16:56 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:02:01PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> Am 29.12.18 um 12:16 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:11:31AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: in my experience with xtensa, it has some basic customizable

Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name

2018-12-29 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:02:01PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Am 29.12.18 um 12:16 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:11:31AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > >> in my experience with xtensa, it has some basic customizable > >> core/instruction set (in this case it is

Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name

2018-12-29 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 29.12.18 um 12:16 schrieb Jonathan McDowell: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:11:31AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> in my experience with xtensa, it has some basic customizable >> core/instruction set (in this case it is lx106) which is then optimized >> for some application (for example for

Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name

2018-12-29 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:11:31AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > in my experience with xtensa, it has some basic customizable > core/instruction set (in this case it is lx106) which is then optimized > for some application (for example for esp8266). At the end, this > toolchain won't be able to

Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name

2018-12-28 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Hi, in my experience with xtensa, it has some basic customizable core/instruction set (in this case it is lx106) which is then optimized for some application (for example for esp8266). At the end, this toolchain won't be able to build binary for different lx106 based hardware. In this case the