Bug#93868: Old ITA

2003-09-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Hi. I currently inspect the Debian wnpp bug list and search for old ITAs (Intent to Adopt) that are mistitled. You have expressed in bug report #93868 [0] the intent to adopt the package "dome". The last comment to this from you is dated from 4 Feb 2003, which is more than six months ago. Do you

Bug#93868: Old ITA

2003-09-19 Thread Streph Treadway
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:49:52PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > You have expressed in bug report #93868 [0] the intent to adopt > the package "dome". The last comment to this from you is dated from > 4 Feb 2003, which is more than six months ago. Do you still intent to adopt > this package

Bug#93868: Old ITA

2003-09-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:22:33PM -0400, Streph Treadway wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:49:52PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > You have expressed in bug report #93868 [0] the intent to adopt > > the package "dome". The last comment to this from you is dated from > > 4 Feb 2003, which is

Bug#93868: Old ITA

2003-09-22 Thread Streph Treadway
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 01:38:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > It's OK to upload a package with no changes other than "New maintainer". > In fact, that's better than leaving it maintained by the QA group; it > saves us in QA from getting confused and accidentally doing work on it > unnecessaril