Bug#950988: RFS review of cglm 0.7.1-1

2020-04-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Leon, Jordan did detect something was wrong with the doc. Indeed, there's some issues. It's overall a good review, though missing some advice, which I intend to give myself here. 1/ Sphinx documentation Your package must be using: --with sphinxdoc and the -doc package must depends on

Bug#950988: RFS review of cglm 0.7.1-1

2020-04-27 Thread Jordan Justen
Leon, I reviewed the 0.7.1-1 packaging you posted on mentors.debian.net. I didn't see any major issues, but maybe some suggestions. The license is MIT, and debian/copyright has it listed properly. I think packages often will call out the debian directory in debian/copyright, even if it matches