Bug#97148: plan to maintain xipmsg, gipmsg

2001-08-14 Thread GOTO Masanori
Hi, > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > I am using gtkipmsg now, I don't really have much clue about X > programming, and I would give this package up if someone wants it. I plan to maintain xipmsg, and intent to package gipmsg. Could you change maintainer ? -- gotom

Bug#97148: plan to maintain xipmsg, gipmsg

2001-08-17 Thread Junichi Uekawa
In Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:17:25 +0900 GOTO cum veritate scripsit : > > I am using gtkipmsg now, I don't really have much clue about X > > programming, and I would give this package up if someone wants it. > > I plan to maintain xipmsg, and intent to package gipmsg. > Could you change maintainer ?

Bug#97148: plan to maintain xipmsg, gipmsg

2001-08-18 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 17 Aug 2001 23:32:54 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > I am using gtkipmsg now, I don't really have much clue about X > > > programming, and I would give this package up if someone wants it. > > > > I plan to maintain xipmsg, and intent to package gipmsg. > > Could you change maintainer

Bug#97148: plan to maintain xipmsg, gipmsg

2001-08-18 Thread Junichi Uekawa
In Sun, 19 Aug 2001 04:15:05 +0900 GOTO cum veritate scripsit : > Thanks. I would make xipmsg with unofficial group patch. Verify that unofficial group patch is not GPL. xipmsg is BSD license with advertizement clause. > > > Also, please check gipmsg, the last time I checked, it did not have

Bug#97148: plan to maintain xipmsg, gipmsg

2001-08-18 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 19 Aug 2001 04:42:14 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Thanks. I would make xipmsg with unofficial group patch. > > Verify that unofficial group patch is not GPL. > xipmsg is BSD license with advertizement clause. Yes, I notice this. Unofficial group patch has no mention about its license.