Hi Petter,
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 7:13 PM Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any news on getting Teensorflow through the NEW queue?
>
I'm afraid not. The NEW queue is quite huge at the moment. We've had a
pretty trivial (but progress-blocking) update to bazel-bootstrap sitting
there for over
Hi,
Any news on getting Teensorflow through the NEW queue?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
> Okay, I used a git snapshot for the version and tarball, and all seems well.
Excellent! that's a very good news.
It's impressive to see all tests to pass from the first attempt. lintian finds
a small issue in the debian/copyright file, but that's all that I see.
Okay, I used a git snapshot for the version and tarball, and all seems well.
The reason I'm tracking is because I actually use the generated packages.
But I'm totally unfamiliar with the salsa continuous integration
stuff. Wouldn't mind learning though.
Happy to change workflow, maybe do development on a different branch?
Or, could make snapshot upstream releases
Thanks, it helps the salsa pipeline. But it fails right after, because the git
content is too different from the tarball of 1.0.20...
I guess there is no easy way to make this pipeline work before the release of
1.1.0. I tend to think that our issues come from the remote tracking of
upstream's
Done. I reverted to 1.0.20 but left debian/watch untouched, so uscan
alerts about 1.0.20-hotfix being available.
If that's a problem I can edit the watch file, just let me know; I
kind of enjoy tweaking them, as it happens.
Guess now we wait for the actual 1.1.0 release.
I fully agree for not uploading before 1.1.0, so I'd go for the
easiest way to please uscan: probably not -hotfix.
I prefer not to mess with uscan files, as I confess to I kinda dislike
this formalism. But if you insist, I can do.
Mt
--
It is easier to port a shell than a shell script. --
Sure, can change it to 1.0.20-hotfix-1 or can edit debian/watch to
skip the -hotfix tag and change it to 1.0.20-1. Or use 1.0.20-1 and
let uscan whine about 1.0.20-hotfix.
Given the changes all around, I don't think we want to actually push
into Debian until 1.1.0 is released anyway. So whether
Le Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:52:02AM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter a écrit :
> There is a pristine-tar branch on both salsa and my GitHub fork repo
I *think* that the issue comes from uscan:
| W: Unable to locate package xournalpp
| Trying uscan --download --download-current-version ...
| uscan
There is a pristine-tar branch on both salsa and my GitHub fork repo
barak/...
Ok, the pipeline is launched. Thanks for the invitation ;)
I would not say that I'm very involved, actually. If I can help, I'm glad, but
if I don't have to, I'm happy :)
If you have difficulties with something, drop me an email.
As for the pipeline, it failed, because it seems that there is
Sure, always happy for help. Please do!
Would you like to take the package, or co-maintain, team-maintain,
whatever it's called nowadays?
I was using it for teaching, whereas you seem much more involved.
Thanks for the update (and for all the work).
Is it OK if I change what needs to be so that the package gets automatically
built on salsa's CI, with lintian and everything launched on it?
(I'm a DD so I have the technical right to do so, but I'm asking for your
permission anyway)
Thanks, Mt.
Yeah, I think right now it's in good shape. I'm waiting for an
official upstream release, at which point I'll upload.
Since it's not in Debian right now, there's no reason to hold off
until after the Debian release. (If there were I'd upload to
Debian/experimental.)
I've been tracking the
Hello Barak,
I'm glad to see that you are still progressing in the packaging of
xournalpp. Last year, you said that the main show stopper was the svg
licenses, that were unclear. But if I understand correctly, you fixed
it too with the following commit.
Also, note the packaging already exists in the Debian Science Team [1].
This would need to be updated for a Bazel build. That process is still
expected to be a bit of a hack with the current `bazel-bootstrap` package
but the Debian Bazel team will be happy to offer advice and assistance.
[1]
Hi,
sorry, I forgot to reply to your first mail. I am Cc:ing the ITP bug
so others take notice of our discussion.
On Mo 23 Jul 2018 19:47:26 CEST, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote:
Hello Mike!
I am a chemistry teacher and I use openboard in my classes.
As I use Debian SID and had to
being the leading SCM repository
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've found so far only the main repository on github at [1] to contains
>>> Debian packaging files.
>>> I've not checked the package on mentors.debian.net extensively but found
>>> it relatively close to
is, you (Alexis Murzeau) and I (Geert),
>>> need to find out what work exists and merge it in one.
>>>
>>> What is needed that some of us says:
>>> URL is for the time being the leading SCM repository
>>>
>>
>> I've found so far only th
find out what work exists and merge it in one.
> >
> > What is needed that some of us says:
> >URL is for the time being the leading SCM repository
> >
>
> I've found so far only the main repository on github at [1] to contains
> Debian packaging files.
>
URL is for the time being the leading SCM repository
>
>
>
> Groeten
> Geert Stappers
> Debian Developer
> Uploader of crosstool-ng
I've found so far only the main repository on github at [1] to contains
Debian packaging files.
I've not checked the package on mentors.debia
Subject: crosstool-ng packaging for Debian
> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 01:53:53 +0200
> From: Alexis Murzeau <amub...@outlook.fr>
> To: Chris Packham <chris.pack...@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
> 721...@bugs.debian.org
> CC: cross...@sourceware.org
>
>
Hi,
This week I worked on packaging crosstool-ng 1.23 for Debian using existing
work.
I found that some dependencies are missing from the binary package so `ct-ng
build` works correctly with minimal base system (like m4, wget).
I also added patches:
- 0001-Disable-MAKELEVEL-check.patch:
An
Hi,
This week I worked on packaging crosstool-ng 1.23 for Debian using existing
work.
I found that some dependencies are missing from the binary package so `ct-ng
build` works correctly with minimal base system (like m4, wget).
I also added patches:
- 0001-Disable-MAKELEVEL-check.patch:
An
Hello:
Any news on this RTP?
I would like to be able to install weblate in Debian Jessie.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Jari,
Your phplint ITP has expired so I took liberty to upgrade package to latest
upstream version and introduced some improvements as well, see
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/phplint.git
However I'm not sure if I want to finish the job -- phplint seems too radical
and
and I work for Facebook, so I decided to do proper packaging of hhvm in
Alioth, as having this done properly is a goal for the team in the first
part of
the year.
Hello, I just wanted to update everyone on this thread with respect to
the
Debian packaging.
I have been working
I have been working (with some help from Faidon) to bring the 2.4.1
tarball to
Debian standards. The git repo (remember,
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://anonscm.debian.org/gitwe
b/?p%3Dcollab-maint/hhvm.git%3Ba%3Dsummaryk=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%
On 03/04/14 00:01, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
Don't act as we have some hidden agenda, please. There are several
things that
I'm putting work on like dropping support for the forked libevent HTTP server,
using alternatives for the php5-cli/cgi binaries to be able to replace them, no
.
This is fine, because what we are trying to do is not just a Debian
packaging
but also fix HHVM for the greater good. It's the HHVM team's desire and my own
goal to make this monster more palatable.
Don't forget the Folly state (no ABI and neither source
Dismissed, as folly is going
of technical debt around some edges. Quoting Paul Tarjan,
I
think we just brought something from the outside to third-party and that gate
kept open forever.
This is fine, because what we are trying to do is not just a Debian
packaging
but also fix HHVM for the greater good. It's
Hello all. My name is Ender, I have been a Debian developer for quite
some
time and I work for Facebook, so I decided to do proper packaging of hhvm in
Alioth, as having this done properly is a goal for the team in the first part of
the year.
I've read the entire thread to
Hi Ender, all,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:16 PM, David Martínez Moreno en...@debian.org wrote:
Hello all. My name is Ender, I have been a Debian developer for
quite some
time and I work for Facebook, so I decided to do proper packaging of hhvm in
Alioth, as having this done properly
Hello Antoine,
much thanks for your email. Unfortunatly I have not the time to manage the
ppa like I want. I have enough to do with other stuff around LiCo. ;)
If you have enough knowledge with bash scripting and ppa building, then you
may of course overtake the whole ppa thingy and manage it.
Hi Alexander,
I am a Debian maintainer interested in sponsoring this package for
Debian. I have opened the ITP #652819 to followup on this work.
I see you have packaged the script as a PPA on Launchpad, that is a
great start!
https://launchpad.net/~alex-mieland/+archive/ppa
I have looked at
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 562980 ITP: ifolder -- keeps directories synchronized on many
computers
Bug #562980 [wnpp] RFP: ifolder -- keeps synchronized the directories on many
computers
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: ifolder -- keeps directories synchronized on many
retitle 562980 ITP: ifolder -- keeps directories synchronized on many computers
owner 562980 Alberto Rodriguez Galdo arga...@mundo-r.com
merge 273303 382667 345127 562980
kthxbye
Hi,
I'm also interested to see iFolder in Debian and Ubuntu since my
employer is currently looking for a portable
Hi all,
On 07/02/2010 00:44, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/Java/LiferayPackaging
I've submitted an initial ITP for liferay-portal [1] (hint: I welcome
any proposal for extended description of this package)
I've also commited some initial packaging structure [2] in
Hi Ben,
I need pycdio for a project of mine, and moticed this ITP.
It is a while since you filed it - are you still interested in
maintaining this? Would you perhaps be interested in a co-maintainer
(favoring Git and CDBS as packaging tools)?
Kind regards,
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard
Hi,
I've started packaging zookeeper for Debian at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/zookeeper.git
The Debian RequestForPackaging bug can be found at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561947
Thank you for ZooKeeper!
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi, all.
I don't know if this is the correct list. If not, forgive me.
I will package a software (LBAdmin: LoadBalancer.org Appliance
Administration System; http://www.loadbalancer.org) for Debian distribution.
This is my first .deb package; so, I am looking for some information and
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 02:58:17PM -0300, John Hood wrote:
Hi, all.
I don't know if this is the correct list. If not, forgive me.
Please write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/
I will package a software (LBAdmin: LoadBalancer.org Appliance
Administration System;
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 10:40 +0100, Linus Gasser wrote:
Hi David,
cool you got kimdaba into debian. Do you have any idea how I can get the
plug-ins to work? In the source-installed kimdaba they worked perfectly.
Now in the debian-kimdaba, I can't even see them...
Hi,
Currently, there's
44 matches
Mail list logo
