Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: superset
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Author : d...@superset.apache.org
* URL : https://superset.apache.org/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : modern data exploration and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 845482 ITP: python-patch-ng -- patch utility to apply unified diffs
Bug #845482 [wnpp] RFP: python-patch -- patch utility to apply unified diffs
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: python-patch-ng -- patch utility to apply unified
diffs' from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 971573 ITP: python-cppimport -- import C or C++ files directly from
> Python
Bug #971573 [wnpp] RFP: python-cppimport -- import C or C++ files directly from
Python
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: python-cppimport -- import C or C++ files
Your message dated Sun, 03 Oct 2021 22:34:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#995427: fixed in mrtg 2.17.7-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #995427,
regarding ITA: mrtg -- multi router traffic grapher
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:38:21 -0300 Fernando Toledo
wrote:
FYI:
I just upload to mentors with some fixes again:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail
Hi Fernando,
Are you still willing to maintain the package?
If not so, please reset to orphan state.
As your mentors upload is gone,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jason Ernst
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ziglang
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Andrew Kelley and...@ziglang.org
* URL : https://ziglang.org
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Zig
Hello everyone,
Is it possible to have an update regarding this issue ?
I do not really understand what the problem with patent is, but I'd like know
if this is still under consideration !
Regards, Adam.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 993066 by 995645
Bug #993066 [wnpp] ITP: python-certbot-dns-standalone -- Standalone (integrated
DNS server) DNS plugin for Certbot
993066 was not blocked by any bugs.
993066 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 993066:
Your message dated Sun, 03 Oct 2021 15:05:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#879872: fixed in inadyn 2.8.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #879872,
regarding ITA: inadyn -- Simple and small DynDNS client written in the C
language
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:28:30 +0800 Benda Xu wrote:
Tags: patch
A merge request has been created for review,
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/inadyn/-/merge_requests/1
with which we will release 2.8.1-1 into sid.
Cheers,
Benda
Hi Benda,
I reviewed your changes. Please set yourself as
Your message dated Sun, 3 Oct 2021 15:13:15 +0200
with message-id <20211003131315.jyer4676klchx...@mail.gaussglocke.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#976227: ITA: breathe -- Sphinx autodox support for
languages with doxygen support
has caused the Debian Bug report #976227,
regarding ITA: breathe --
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 995619 with 995626
Bug #995619 [wnpp] ITP: helvum -- GTK patchbay for pipewire
995619 was not blocked by any bugs.
995619 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 995619: 995626
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
librust-gtk4 0.3. fails to build with rustc 1.52.1
due to the use of syntax to embed text into source:
> #![doc = include_str!("../README.md")]
That syntax is however used only to embed README file
which is argualby acceptable to patch away.
I have succesfully built librust-gtk4 0.3 with rustc
Dear w...@debian.org,
You have some incoming messages that are placed on hold.
Kindly RE-ACTIVATE your w...@debian.org account below to access incoming
messages.
Activation expires after 2hours from 10/04/2021 7:12:37 pm and your Email
w...@debian.org will be blocked
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Rust Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: librust-gtk4
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : gtk-rs Project members
* URL : https://github.com/gtk-rs/gtk4-rs/
* License
Quoting Romain Porte (2021-10-03 12:22:46)
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Romain Porte
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org,
> deb...@microjoe.org
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> * Package name: csvquote
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: helvum
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Tom A. Wagner
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Porte
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org,
deb...@microjoe.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: csvquote
Version : 0.0~20180528
Upstream Author : Dan Brown
*
❦ 3 October 2021 09:16 +02, Michael Stapelberg:
> I will stress one more time that what we need here is not a one-time
> sponsorship offer, but a multi-year commitment for maintaining the
> i3-gaps package in Debian.
Let's hear from antisocrates. I can offer a multi-year commitment for
Personally, I don’t want gaps to be built from src:i3-wm.
It’s enough work to maintain one version of i3.
That said, sur5r is doing all of the Debian work since I retired from
Debian,
so it’s ultimately up to him.
I will stress one more time that what we need here is not a one-time
sponsorship
❦ 3 October 2021 08:48 +02, Michael Stapelberg:
> I still think it’d be better to spend time on merging gaps rather than
> packaging gaps,
> but it seems like nobody has the skill set and/or motivation.
This is a very different skillset from packaging.
> Is there someone who would
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kentaro Hayashi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, ken...@xdump.org
* Package name: libfreeaptx
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Hunter Wardlaw
* URL : https://github.com/iamthehorker/libfreeaptx
* License :
I still think it’d be better to spend time on merging gaps rather than
packaging gaps,
but it seems like nobody has the skill set and/or motivation.
Is there someone who would continuously maintain i3-gaps in Debian?
I wouldn’t want that package to diverge from upstream i3 in terms of which
❦ 17 June 2019 18:30 +02, Michael Stapelberg:
> Ingo will outline what needs to be done to get i3-gaps into a mergable
> state, so that we can eventually bring these features to all i3 users.
>
> For the time being, our recommendation is to NOT add i3-gaps to Debian or
> any other Linux
24 matches
Mail list logo
