On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Another one is a better use of communication tools: such as our identi.ca
> group [5]. I'm not a very microblogging (or blogging at all) person, but
> using it is simple and quite fun, and it's important to reach people who
> doesn't real
* Helen Faulkner [2011:04:20 21:06 +1000]:
> When I was more involved in Debian Women (and, in fact, in Debian), I had the
> opinion that keeping Debian Women "moving" as a community was crucial to
> attract
> and hold the attention of people who might become involved as contributers to
> Debian
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach
wrote:
> As an example of where numbers continue to grow: the majority of women
> involved with Ubuntu who aren't employed by Canonical are
> non-packaging contributors. Event coordination for local teams,
> documentation, educational outreach (
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Margarita Manterola
wrote:
> Apart from that, is there
> something that we might do to get more women to contribute to Debian?
On a personal level my lack of involvement these past couple years has
been lack of time. A vast majority of the systems I work on from d
On Mon 18 Apr 2011 11:36:01, Margarita Manterola wrote:
>Last year, we did the IRC training sessions which worked fine, and I
>hope that they can happen again this year.
Yes, I hope it too.
But so far, I've not received many replies to my proposal of a new round of
IRC sessions [1], so I let i
On 19/04/11 4:31 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Maybe we need to recreate the circumstances from the early days of
> debian-women?
>
> - get someone to post unbelievably sexist remarks on debian-devel
> - summon our righteous indignation about this behavior, drawing attention
>with blogs, etc.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Margarita Manterola
wrote:
> Just to say, I went ahead and did this. Mailed everyone in the
> uploaders list who is/was not a DD. Some of those, I was pretty sure
> that they read the mailing list, but I decided to mail them as well to
> avoid anyone being left ov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Margarita Manterola
wrote:
> At some point I had planned to mail all the non-DD first uploaders, to
> find out if they have some opinion to share about their experience,
> and how things could be improved, but I never did it. I'm going to do
> that now, since I th
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:29:47PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > The increase of female DDs between 2005 and 2008 might be
> > statistically related to the increase of first uploads between 2003
> > and 2005 according to the graph. It could also be unrelated, the
> > evidence is not very so
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> We seem to be having a reasonable upwards trend in the number of first
> uploads, even though not as good as it was between 2003-2005.
Well, it's always going to be upwards, since it's counting first
uploads and not active uploaders, that wo
2011/4/18 Margarita Manterola :
> Hey all,
Hi!
> Today, after chatting a bit with Meike, I took the time to update the
> stats and the graph located at
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Statistics
Thanks! Those stats are really useful to know what's going on.
> Since I did it last year, we'v
Hey all,
Today, after chatting a bit with Meike, I took the time to update the
stats and the graph located at
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Statistics
Since I did it last year, we've only had 2 new female uploaders, and
Francesca has started the process to become a non-uploading DD (which
wi
12 matches
Mail list logo
