new page for pre-installed debian

1999-10-12 Thread James A. Treacy
I just committed a preliminary version for a new page dedicated to companies that sell systems with Debian pre-installed. If you know of any other vendors that pre-install Debian, let us know. I'll fix up the format before it gets linked in. The changes shouldn't affect the translation though. Any

Re: no link to the y2k page?

1999-10-12 Thread peter karlsson
> is there some html standard that talks about tags? They are obviously in HTML 4.0, since validator.w3.org doesn't complain on that. -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ - and God said: nohup make World >& World.log &

Re: no link to the y2k page?

1999-10-12 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:11:34AM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote: > Anyone care to spend a little time looking into some reorganization? > We need to make sure that information is organized so that it is > easy to find. I've been playing around with it a bit -- not sure I'm going to come up with an

Re: no link to the y2k page?

1999-10-12 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously James A. Treacy wrote: > We thought it was important enough that a link is right on the > main page. Scroll down a page and you'll see it. Duh! We completely missed that. On a related note: Cistron (the people hosting www.nl.debian.org) appears to be willing to setup a searchengine for

Re: no link to the y2k page?

1999-10-12 Thread James A. Treacy
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 02:49:34PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > I just had somebody ask me if there was any y2k-info for Debian.. a quick > search of the site revealed absolutely nothing.. > > Some looking around on va produce http://www.debian.org/y2k/, which has > some info but seems real

no link to the y2k page?

1999-10-12 Thread Wichert Akkerman
I just had somebody ask me if there was any y2k-info for Debian.. a quick search of the site revealed absolutely nothing.. Some looking around on va produce http://www.debian.org/y2k/, which has some info but seems really incomplete. Is that page still intended to be our y2k-page, and if so why