Josip Rodin:
> > Fixed so that it does not die when the original file has been removed, now
> > it just prints another warning message (which needs to be translated).
> Why?
Because it caused all documents after the document in question not to
build, possibly keeping back important updates, or br
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20010115
Severity: normal
There's no "tech" in architecture, at least not in the US. I looked at some
websites on British-American equivalents and could find no evidence for this
spelling in the UK.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 11:00:38PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Josip Rodin wrote:
> >
> > > Er, what? If the links are wrong, it's most probably due to the fact
> > > mirror
> > > on the machine (master) is outdated.
> >
> > That mirror is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 68388 lists.debian.org
Bug#68388: please rename debian-parisc
Bug reassigned from package `listarchives' to `lists.debian.org'.
> retitle 68388 please remove debian-parisc from lists.cfg
Bug#68388: please rename debian-parisc
Changed Bug title
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:57:15PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > Er, what? If the links are wrong, it's most probably due to the fact
> > > mirror
> > > on the machine (master) is outdated.
> >
> > That mirror is no longer running, and cannot be made to run. You will ha
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> > Er, what? If the links are wrong, it's most probably due to the fact mirror
> > on the machine (master) is outdated.
>
> That mirror is no longer running, and cannot be made to run. You will have
> to make the web pages not
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/debhelper.html
> > klappt immer noch nicht :(
> >
> > while looking for the debhelper from within pools or unstable.
> >
> > Can somebody investigate this please?
>
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:57:15PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Er, what? If the links are wrong, it's most probably due to the fact mirror
> > on the machine (master) is outdated.
>
> That mirror is no longer running, and cannot be made to run. You will have
> to make the web pages not rely
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 07:10:00PM +0100, Lenart Janos wrote:
> I think I found a bug in packages.debian.org. If you go to
> http://packages.debian.org/cfe that should show "cfe"'s page and not
> "cfengine"'s, yeah? Both packages are exist.
That URL will give you search results for 'cfe*', that'
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:18:10PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have to post a translated version of the maint-guide.sgml
>
> I know that the web pages for the DDP are in the main CVS so I tought
> the also the documentation should be availble there.
> May I just use my CVS account for w.d.
On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Er, what? If the links are wrong, it's most probably due to the fact mirror
> on the machine (master) is outdated.
That mirror is no longer running, and cannot be made to run. You will have
to make the web pages not rely on a local mirror.
Jason
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 09:11:25AM +0100, Debian WWW CVS wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml
> Module name: webwml
> Changes by: peterk 01/01/13 09:11:25
>
> Modified files:
> english/template/debian: translation-check.wml
>
> Log message:
> Fixed so that it does not die when the origin
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/debhelper.html
> klappt immer noch nicht :(
>
> while looking for the debhelper from within pools or unstable.
>
> Can somebody investigate this please?
Er, what? If the links are wrong,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 81761 packages.debian.org: recent packages not included
Bug#81761: /distrib/packages does not yet know about pools?
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator,
retitle 81761 packages.debian.org: recent packages not included
thanks
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 08:52:56AM +0100, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> searching for recent packages which are in the pool now is not
> possible with the http://www.debian.org/d
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jan 2001 22:15:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#81712: english/releases/woody/index.wml and b-f
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 12:41:05AM +0100, NAGY Viktor wrote:
> Is there any visitors statistics of debian.org? I'm interested, how many
> visitors have the Hungarian pages.
There are Webalizer stats at
http://klecker.debian.org/webalizer/www.debian.org/ though I'm not sure if
they contain such dat
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 07:10:00PM +0100, Lenart Janos wrote:
> I think I found a bug in packages.debian.org. If you go to
> http://packages.debian.org/cfe that should show "cfe"'s page and not
> "cfengine"'s, yeah? Both packages are exist.
What release is cfe in? I found it in the pools, but n
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:49:37PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> I just updated the url check of the debian pages.
> As usual, the results can be found at
> http://people.debian.org/~treacy/urlcheck/
On related note, it appears that the urlchecker hasn't been recognized by
webalizer, and it's pu
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 05:11:36PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 68388 listarchives
> Bug#68388: please rename debian-parisc
> Bug reassigned from package `lists-archives' to `listarchives'.
As far as I can tell, the web site
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 06:34:12PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Why is it necessary to have those ugly DSA-?? strings in the indices for
> security web pages? IMO they only clutter the list, and for no purpose. Why
> would a random user/admin need to care about that number before the package
> name?
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 04:59:38PM +0100, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > > The Freeradius project (more specifically Chad Miller) have
> > > developed a WWW fronted to its own BTS as proposed in this bug report.
> > > It can be checked in http://bugs.freeradius.org/cgi-bin-local/su
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 12:12:03PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reopen 21620
> Bug#21620: packages.debian.org: should support multiple architectures
> Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
>
> > retitle 21620 package download pages shou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 21620
Bug#21620: packages.debian.org: should support multiple architectures
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
> retitle 21620 package download pages should support multiple architectures
Bug#21620: packages.debian.org: should support multiple
Hello!
I think I found a bug in packages.debian.org. If you go to
http://packages.debian.org/cfe that should show "cfe"'s page and not
"cfengine"'s, yeah? Both packages are exist.
p.s: Please Cc me the mails, because I am not subscribed to this list.
--
Lenart, Janos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp
Hi,
Why is it necessary to have those ugly DSA-?? strings in the indices for
security web pages? IMO they only clutter the list, and for no purpose. Why
would a random user/admin need to care about that number before the package
name? They apt-get package names, not sequences of numbers :)
Beside
I have to post a translated version of the maint-guide.sgml
I know that the web pages for the DDP are in the main CVS so I tought
the also the documentation should be availble there.
May I just use my CVS account for w.d.o ? Is there a differente
rsync module for the documentation?
Thanks,
Giusep
27 matches
Mail list logo
